In terms of car model regeneration, why engine model still elected to carried over from previous car model generation?

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
Post Reply
theriusDR3
5
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 09:04
Location: Pontianak, Indonesia
Contact:

In terms of car model regeneration, why engine model still elected to carried over from previous car model generation?

Post

In Formula 1 auto racing the engine model can be changed every year even every season while in reality every road car models still carry-over the engine model generation from previous generation in terms of regeneration.

Your thoughts?

theriusDR3
5
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 09:04
Location: Pontianak, Indonesia
Contact:

Re: In terms of car model regeneration, why engine model still elected to carried over from previous car model generatio

Post

Example Honda, they change the engine model generation into EarthDreams GDI even TGDI DOHC for a new generation of Honda cars

And also Mitsubishi recently revealed the Eclipse Cross SUV car with an all-new MIVEC 1.5 inline-4 TGDI engine

Greg Locock
233
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 00:48

Re: In terms of car model regeneration, why engine model still elected to carried over from previous car model generatio

Post

A rule of thumb is that in complexity we have three systems in a car. Body. Engine. Transmission. The rule of thumb is that you only introduce one new one of these at a time, if possible. We have a discipline called program size, and the amount of change in each of these is multiplied together to give you an idea of how long it'll take to develop. New engine*new transmission*new body =3*3*3=27, then divide that by some number for you organisation's development speed, 3 being typical then add a year, because. Hence 27/3+1=10 years from scratch for an all new vehicle (say Prius), or two years to put a new engine in an old car with the old trans (3*1*1/3)+1. Or to put an updated engine and gearbox into an existing shell, say 2*2*1/3+1= 2 years

These timings aren't rigorous, but they are robust. The multiplicative effect means that big changes to all three systems at the same time are not encouraged. Small teams working on low production volume vehicles can easily beat these times.

Post Reply