
Tyre selection
C3 - C4 - C5
2024 Results
Qualifying

Race


2024 Pole Lap
2024 Race Highlights
Schedule and more information
Please
I wonder what it will do to their tyre deg from sector2 and sector3 on a super hot track. Maybe they can 'deal with it' with more cranked up beam wing(s).r85 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 18:41https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/E18753 ... AAuVly.jpg
https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/CC1226 ... AAqdTG.jpg
Red Bull looks pretty confident with their low downforce rear wing
It's not like they'll gain much in S1 because there are 3 DRS zones that basically nullify the rear wing choice. But who knows, they're pretty strong in the fast corners and have sorted out their traction issues with the Miami-Imola updates.venkyhere wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 19:43I wonder what it will do to their tyre deg from sector2 and sector3 on a super hot track. Maybe they can 'deal with it' with more cranked up beam wing(s).r85 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 18:41https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/E18753 ... AAuVly.jpg
https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/CC1226 ... AAqdTG.jpg
Red Bull looks pretty confident with their low downforce rear wing
I wouldn't be surprised if by the time it's Q, this changes from low DF to a low-mid or even mid DF wing.
You are talking from a quali perspective. I am talking from a race perspective - smaller rear wing will help defend against overtakes, but the cost (I reckon) will be tyre life (esp on boiling tarmac). It's a thursday attachment anyway, what we saw today. Let's wait until Q to see what the final RW choice looks like.r85 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 20:41It's not like they'll gain much in S1 because there are 3 DRS zones that basically nullify the rear wing choice. But who knows, they're pretty strong in the fast corners and have sorted out their traction issues with the Miami-Imola updates.venkyhere wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 19:43I wonder what it will do to their tyre deg from sector2 and sector3 on a super hot track. Maybe they can 'deal with it' with more cranked up beam wing(s).r85 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 18:41https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/E18753 ... AAuVly.jpg
https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/CC1226 ... AAqdTG.jpg
Red Bull looks pretty confident with their low downforce rear wing
I wouldn't be surprised if by the time it's Q, this changes from low DF to a low-mid or even mid DF wing.
Redbull did the same in Canada, looks like they're trying to qualify very high up in the order and stay in clean air as long as possible, the issue is the end of sector 2 and all of sector 3 where you need the tyres.venkyhere wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 22:23You are talking from a quali perspective. I am talking from a race perspective - smaller rear wing will help defend against overtakes, but the cost (I reckon) will be tyre life (esp on boiling tarmac). It's a thursday attachment anyway, what we saw today. Let's wait until Q to see what the final RW choice looks like.
Low DF wing isn't really going to help you qualify high here though. The track is mostly DRS and the bit that isn't, a low DF wing will be a problem for sliding around in the medium speed corners.SB15 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 22:30Redbull did the same in Canada, looks like they're trying to qualify very high up in the order and stay in clean air as long as possible, the issue is the end of sector 2 and all of sector 3 where you need the tyres.venkyhere wrote: ↑26 Jun 2025, 22:23You are talking from a quali perspective. I am talking from a race perspective - smaller rear wing will help defend against overtakes, but the cost (I reckon) will be tyre life (esp on boiling tarmac). It's a thursday attachment anyway, what we saw today. Let's wait until Q to see what the final RW choice looks like.
I think it's really ambitious, Max would have to put in a stormer of a lap to get ahead of both Mclarens and Mercs but, stay there long enough where the tyres doesn't degrade and heat up as much since it'll be 32c on Sunday.