because your gallery pictures are 800x532, and speaking for myself i prefer a greater resolution to study the details.Principessa wrote:I wonder why everybody keeps posting pictures of other sites here if all the good and important pictures are online here in our gallery:
http://www.f1technical.net/gallery/v/Re ... 27/Launch/
Maybe some of you haven't found our gallery yet
i hate being on the opposing side of the establishment, but i have to agree with this.....my current screen resolution is 1280x1024 and 1680x1050 and anything 1024x768 or smaller just doesnt work.....pyry wrote:because your gallery pictures are 800x532, and speaking for myself i prefer a greater resolution to study the details.Principessa wrote:I wonder why everybody keeps posting pictures of other sites here if all the good and important pictures are online here in our gallery:
http://www.f1technical.net/gallery/v/Re ... 27/Launch/
Maybe some of you haven't found our gallery yet
and it doesn't cost me so much....pyry wrote:http://www.gurneyflap.com/formula1renault.html well those are for instance
Answer:What do you think of the colours?
What about the drivers' interviews?
Are the ambitions for the team in line with what you expect?
And what are your hopes and fears for the new season?
ShockING
DisturbING
Eye-waterING
If I were a driver, I'd be hidING
If I designed the livery, I'd be apologizING
If I were, I'd find this car embarassING
Alonso must be laughING
But please excuse me, because I feel like vomitING
Well if all of you would donate 5 euro /month I would be glad to upload images at higher resolution, but it costs a lot for me with all these visitors lately. Hosting has a limited traffic amount per month, and any additional traffic just costs me more, as simple as that. Why do you think I'm looking so hard for sponsors or people who wish to relieve the costs a bit?fwa2500 wrote:i hate being on the opposing side of the establishment, but i have to agree with this.....my current screen resolution is 1280x1024 and 1680x1050 and anything 1024x768 or smaller just doesnt work.....pyry wrote:because your gallery pictures are 800x532, and speaking for myself i prefer a greater resolution to study the details.Principessa wrote:I wonder why everybody keeps posting pictures of other sites here if all the good and important pictures are online here in our gallery:
http://www.f1technical.net/gallery/v/Re ... 27/Launch/
Maybe some of you haven't found our gallery yet
Yes, you're right, I have an upload of about 15 Go each month and getting more will cost..more and manchild is right too, more visits (an average of about 400 each day for Gurneyflap) will increase costs because people are coming to upload photos.Venom wrote:Not really, it's only bandwidth that is needed with high traffic.
Unless a site has millions of visits each day (google, yahoo) which requires more then one server to manage the load, in which case F1T is not experiencing at the moment. Well, not YET anyway.
