During a rainy last test day at the Circuit de Catalunya near Barcelona, Red Bull Racing driver Mark Webber was the fastest man on track. Webber clocked a time of 1:21.953 in his RB4 and was followed by Renault's Nelson Piquet Jr. and Ferrari's Kimi Raikkonen. The teams will head back to the factory now to make the final preparations for the Spanish Grand Prix on 27 April.
Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
I guess BMW took a moderate approach to that fin in order not to
negatively affect their car's sensitive balance/handling
I'm still waiting for that big step forward McLaren were talking
about, they are no doubt going to slip further away from leading
pack unless they bring something new this test.
Interviewer: The most exciting moment during the race weekend? Kimi: I think it's the race start, always. Interviewer: The most boring? Kimi: Now.
Ferrari's new nose looks good, but how does it work? That is, it's easy to see where the air goes out, but where does it come in? Is there an opening under the nose we have not seen yet? I believe the new nose takes advantage of the low pressure area under the nose, so I'm guessing there's an opening under the nose that corresponds to the opening on top?
Sorry for the basic question, but I'm with Enzo "Aerodynamics are for peole who can't build good engines" (borrowed from another member's signature)
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill
The only evident (so far) difference from current RB4 is that there's no bargeboard-podvane connection. Previously different rear end design now looks identical from this angle.
donskar wrote:OK, dumb question:
Ferrari's new nose looks good, but how does it work? That is, it's easy to see where the air goes out, but where does it come in? Is there an opening under the nose we have not seen yet? I believe the new nose takes advantage of the low pressure area under the nose, so I'm guessing there's an opening under the nose that corresponds to the opening on top?
Yes, ther's an opening under the nose and the airflow coing off the front wing is 'sucked in'. It helps to create more downforce on the front wing and possibly improves the airflow to the airbox and the rear wing.
read/see more here
Bob Brown wrote:Is it me, or does the rear wing look like it doesn't have endplates?
The rear wing looks so nice without the endplates! What are those enormous endplates for, anyway? Can´t the rear wing be sustained by only those middle pillars? Are that big endplates that necessary in terms of aerodynamics? And sorry for the questions! xp
I've read on a french website that Williams were testing sliks since yesterday. However, I haven't seen a single pic of them with slicks. Have I missed it, or is the site out of the game?...
gerhard wrote:The rear wing looks so nice without the endplates! What are those enormous endplates for, anyway? Can´t the rear wing be sustained by only those middle pillars? Are that big endplates that necessary in terms of aerodynamics? And sorry for the questions! xp
The endplates restrict
the formation of tip vortices, increasing the effective span of the wing. In short, the horizontal shape functions better throughout its length and produces more downforce. There are very well versed aero guys here as well and I'm sure they could elaborate further on this.
"In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." - Yogi Berra
vyselegend wrote:I've read on a french website that Williams were testing sliks since yesterday. However, I haven't seen a single pic of them with slicks. Have I missed it, or is the site out of the game?...