The proposition is to lower it from 15cm to 7.5cm. How will they do this? Different shaped nose cone? Longer hanging struts? Or a return to V keel?
Any speculation or discussion is appreciated!
Chris
It depends what the actuators are made out of. If the FIA wanted to be innovative as they believe they are, they would allow Shape-memory actuators which would take up far less room and be lighter than anything hydraulic.zac510 wrote:Then we have the actuators for the up-down part of the wing to fit in the nose somewhere.
its my favourite German siteOgami musashi wrote:On motorsport-total.com (which by the way seems to be a good site) there's an interview of ross brawn on KERS and 2009 regs, and in illustration a rear wing CFD from renault.
I don't understand german, so i translated it via prompt and it suggests it is a a rear wing with 2009 regs, containing 3 elements, i heard some time ago that going back to 3 elements was considered...
By the way, here's the picture:
"Mit CFD-Simulationen wurde die neue Aerodynamik für 2009 erarbeitet" (what does it mean?)
that's not exactly what he said. he said that he belives all teams will build cars that can run with and without KERS. they will try different versions and havn't decided if they have batteries or not. but he spoke about batteries as a field where they work with an external partner.Ogami musashi wrote:No i haven't sorry. In case some of you didn't read the interview of ross brawn, the point is that honda will surely design two cars, one with the KERS the other without it because it seems the KERS is not necessarily worth the weight, something Scarbs told us few months ago.
Well its almost obvious that the KERS system will not be actually visible, but it will be noticeable as it will take up more space in the rear end packaging of the car for sure. So that will be one of the visible differences along with the changes (restrictions) in the aero regulations.Scotracer wrote:He also said, in terms of packaging that you wouldn't be able to actually see the KERS from the outside. So, the only thing that would change the look of the cars is the new aero configuration. I can't see the nose being any different from now (there are no rules which stipulate it) but it just depends on how the CFD/wind-tunnel results come out.
.....
What I want to know, is how streamlined the bodies will be. Can they be as sculpted as now, just without winglets? To what degree will they be similar to todays chassis'? Oh how I love new regulations