Why is unsprungmass negative?

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Marst
Marst
0
Joined: 25 Jun 2004, 09:14

Why is unsprungmass negative?

Post

Would anybody be kind enough to explain in what point unsprung mass has negative effect on race car dynamics. Thanks.

Rogue230
Rogue230
0
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 19:34

Don't want to go off half-cocked

Post

I'll post an answer over the weekend. :wink:

Rogue230
Rogue230
0
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 19:34

Delayed, sorry

Post

Unsrung mass has the effect of transfering road-shock to the car. It has inertia and doesn't want to respond to changes in the road.

Also, it slows the tires downward return to the pavement causing a potential loss of contact with the road.

Consider a go-cart; All mass is unsrung and all road irregularities are tranfered directly to the car.

If it were possible to have 0% unsprung mass the tires would quickly respond to road changes and return downward without delay giving a virtually perfect ride.

Seeing as perfect isn't possible, minimizing unsprung mass is highly desirable.

Micky
Micky
0
Joined: 20 Sep 2002, 21:36
Location: Scotland

Post

What exactly is unsprung mass?

Rogue230
Rogue230
0
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 19:34

Sprung vs unsprung mass

Post

Sprung mass is everything riding on the springs; the body, engine, trans-axel.

Unsprung mass is that which the springs ride on; tires, wheels, out-board brakes.

Some parts are a mix; A-arms are 50-50. Half sprung and half unsprung, effectively.