n smikle wrote:I just read this in an interview, makes you wonder how fast a team can react during the season:
. How far in advance do you begin planning for such an upgrade package?
JA: "It depends on the component. Some simple upgrades are found in the tunnel in the days running up to the race, but most of the parts would have been conceived around 6-8 weeks ago, would have run in the tunnel around 4 weeks ago and then been designed and made for the car in time for the Turkey GP."
Unlikely that any part makes it onto a car unproven - either in the tunnel, CFD simulations, during FP sessions, or some combination thereof. Simple parts can be made, then tested on wind tunnel models, static test rigs, or even during FP sessions. This is feasible since tooling can be made very quickly and cheaply - pattern shops can produce and prepare most plugs or moulds in hours, at most a couple days.
Autoclave cycles depend on the composite used and part geometry - the part is brought up to the target temperature and pressure at a controlled rate, then held for a given time, then brought back to ambient.
Finishing, measurement, and any non-destructive testing is similarly quick.
Bottom line, making parts is quick, trying to make sure they'll make things better and not worse is slow!
Rapid prototyping technology has made part production even faster, check out Windform XT - I believe that's what RBR was using last season for mirror pods.