F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
CMSMJ1
CMSMJ1
Moderator
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:51 am
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

I don;t see why we don't get skinnier tyres and a higher minimum ride height.

The cars are still mindbendingly fast in the wet - losing another 5 seconds on the altar of them being safer (slower) and with less sprary due to the skinny tyres (relatively) is a good deal.

Sliding, car control and the ability to actually race in full wet conditions is the goal for me.

The current tyres are massive. Enormous - so why not reduce them?
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

User avatar
Big Tea
96
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:57 pm

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

CMSMJ1 wrote:
Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
I don;t see why we don't get skinnier tyres and a higher minimum ride height.

The cars are still mindbendingly fast in the wet - losing another 5 seconds on the altar of them being safer (slower) and with less sprary due to the skinny tyres (relatively) is a good deal.

Sliding, car control and the ability to actually race in full wet conditions is the goal for me.

The current tyres are massive. Enormous - so why not reduce them?
I think it is vision rather than speed or control that is the problem
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

CMSMJ1
CMSMJ1
Moderator
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:51 am
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

Big Tea wrote:
Wed Nov 23, 2022 6:22 pm
CMSMJ1 wrote:
Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
I don;t see why we don't get skinnier tyres and a higher minimum ride height.

The cars are still mindbendingly fast in the wet - losing another 5 seconds on the altar of them being safer (slower) and with less sprary due to the skinny tyres (relatively) is a good deal.

Sliding, car control and the ability to actually race in full wet conditions is the goal for me.

The current tyres are massive. Enormous - so why not reduce them?
I think it is vision rather than speed or control that is the problem
I think that skinny tyres and higher, taller cars will be slower. The tyres will throw less water up, the aero will not suck as much from the roads and because everyone is slower then the risks are reduced.

Watching MOTOGP I see they ride in some disgusting conditions. I'd get you to watch Austria 2021..A great race. Or France 2021..
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

User avatar
JordanMugen
68
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:36 pm

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

CMSMJ1 wrote:
Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
The current tyres are massive. Enormous - so why not reduce them?
You mean for wet conditions only?

They only just put the rear tyres back to the width they were from 1972 to 1992 recently in 2017. It would be a shame to undo that (IMO positive) change already.

By all means reduce the front tyre width though, the way the front and rear tyres were scaled equally (with the front tyres previously never reduced in width) instead of installing a more rearward weight balance in 2017 was strange.

CMSMJ1
CMSMJ1
Moderator
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:51 am
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

JordanMugen wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:17 pm
CMSMJ1 wrote:
Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
The current tyres are massive. Enormous - so why not reduce them?
You mean for wet conditions only?

They only just put the rear tyres back to the width they were from 1972 to 1992 recently in 2017. It would be a shame to undo that (IMO positive) change already.

By all means reduce the front tyre width though, the way the front and rear tyres were scaled equally (with the front tyres previously never reduced in width) instead of installing a more rearward weight balance in 2017 was strange.
Yes. Only for wet. The larger footprint is a disadvantage in the heavy wet and surely throws a significant amount of water up.

It would also make the brave switch to inters more viable as we moved to drier conditions!
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

Pat Pending
Pat Pending
3
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 12:11 pm

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

CMSMJ1 wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:49 pm
JordanMugen wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:17 pm
CMSMJ1 wrote:
Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:24 pm
The current tyres are massive. Enormous - so why not reduce them?
You mean for wet conditions only?

They only just put the rear tyres back to the width they were from 1972 to 1992 recently in 2017. It would be a shame to undo that (IMO positive) change already.

By all means reduce the front tyre width though, the way the front and rear tyres were scaled equally (with the front tyres previously never reduced in width) instead of installing a more rearward weight balance in 2017 was strange.
Yes. Only for wet. The larger footprint is a disadvantage in the heavy wet and surely throws a significant amount of water up.

It would also make the brave switch to inters more viable as we moved to drier conditions!
Wouldn't that just make the current 'problem' worse, i.e. the wet tyres are so much slower than the inters?
Tbh, an arguably better bet might be to make the inters slower, so a) the wet-inters/slick progression is more even, and b) the switch from inters to slicks becomes much more of a tactical decision.

CMSMJ1
CMSMJ1
Moderator
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:51 am
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: F1 Evaluating ‘Wheel Arches’

Post

Pat Pending wrote:
Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:11 am
CMSMJ1 wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:49 pm
JordanMugen wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:17 pm


You mean for wet conditions only?

They only just put the rear tyres back to the width they were from 1972 to 1992 recently in 2017. It would be a shame to undo that (IMO positive) change already.

By all means reduce the front tyre width though, the way the front and rear tyres were scaled equally (with the front tyres previously never reduced in width) instead of installing a more rearward weight balance in 2017 was strange.
Yes. Only for wet. The larger footprint is a disadvantage in the heavy wet and surely throws a significant amount of water up.

It would also make the brave switch to inters more viable as we moved to drier conditions!
Wouldn't that just make the current 'problem' worse, i.e. the wet tyres are so much slower than the inters?
Tbh, an arguably better bet might be to make the inters slower, so a) the wet-inters/slick progression is more even, and b) the switch from inters to slicks becomes much more of a tactical decision.
I think the current problemis that no-one runs the wet tyres at all and we don;t get races that run unless a safety car is on track.

Making them run - even if it is another 10s slower is, in my view, better than rolling around behind the SC until it is safe to go to inters?
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM