Bill wrote: β04 Jul 2023, 19:50
lio007 wrote: β04 Jul 2023, 19:26
Bill wrote: β04 Jul 2023, 15:34
2nd in terms of power ,how did they come to that conclusion seem like make it as you go along.what exatly are they measuring if they dont even have a full pu connected.it will be 50 -50 power contribution
It was meant with pure V6 power.
2026 regulation in terms of combustion are the same as current with exception variable length intake trumpets .the pu will severely restricted so i doubt they will be any change in pecking order .the challenge apparently is on electrical systems.
What's the challenge here? The MGU-H operation was by far the challenge in these regulations. As it stands, MGU-K is rather trivial. It's a motor that can absorb and deploy energy. There will be little to no differences in performance between the teams of the MGU-K unit or Energy store. The battery packs being used are made of commercial lithium ion cells from common third party suppliers.
The "challenge" will be conducting simulations to tell you when to harvest and when to deploy.
ICE power has been slashed considerably and therefore by proxy, the amount of energy that can be absorbed by the MGU-K under race conditions has also been slashed.
It's going to force a different style of racing where the focus is on using the ICE to harvest around the race track at the end of the straights, in order to use the MGU-K at the beginning of the straights. This tactic will be decided by simulations as well. I do not see anything particularly interesting in these new regulations beyond the traditional ICE development (combustion, turbo geometry). The rest of it will be born purely out of simulations that tell you when is best to activate the MGU-K for recovery or deployment. There will be little to no differencies in performance of the MGU-K unit itself, across the different suppliers.
As I said before, the interesting part was the MGU-H, and that is where Honda really stole a march on the competition.
A lion must kill its prey.