



I've noticed that some of the teams seem to be taking more liberties with the update declaration document recently. Maybe the FIA not really enforcing any clear standards or penalizing inaccuracies/omissions is leading to this.
Man I really don't think so. If you look at the shrouds you can see that theres a seam a few inches out from where they exit the body. If the body was thinner in that area, there would be a bigger distance from the surface to that seam, but there is not.SiLo wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 11:20I think the body work is thinner, so it just looks that way.Brahmal wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 03:11https://i.imgur.com/bPUWA5A.jpeg
Am I seeing things or has the suspension geometry been changed? The angle of photo is a little different but not that much.
You are very correct on what you're seeing, I guess me and you have eagle eye vision that we notice the differences between the 2. Believe I would've said you're wrong if that was the case, and clearly you're not spreading misinformation.Brahmal wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 19:24Man I really don't think so. If you look at the shrouds you can see that theres a seam a few inches out from where they exit the body. If the body was thinner in that area, there would be a bigger distance from the surface to that seam, but there is not.SiLo wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 11:20I think the body work is thinner, so it just looks that way.Brahmal wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 03:11https://i.imgur.com/bPUWA5A.jpeg
Am I seeing things or has the suspension geometry been changed? The angle of photo is a little different but not that much.
Thank you for posting this. I have no idea why does it takes 5-6 times to tell people something soo obvious was changed and look at you like you're crazy?Lasssept wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 22:46Autoracer
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... 4x683.webp
Judging by what I read from AMuS, your point about the FW spec being more rigid was also correct as well. Although I still think they just incorporated that component into the design change rather than increased rigidity being the impetus for the new spec.SB15 wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 23:06Thank you for posting this. I have no idea why does it takes 5-6 times to tell people something soo obvious was changed and look at you like you're crazy?Lasssept wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 22:46Autoracer
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... 4x683.webp![]()
Or, they aren't completely sure the new FW will work as intendes so they're testing it now. If it doesn't work they can still use the old one and figure out what is wrong with the new speczibby43 wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 23:21Judging by what I read from AMuS, your point about the FW spec being more rigid was also correct as well. Although I still think they just incorporated that component into the design change rather than increased rigidity being the impetus for the new spec.SB15 wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 23:06Thank you for posting this. I have no idea why does it takes 5-6 times to tell people something soo obvious was changed and look at you like you're crazy?Lasssept wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 22:46Autoracer
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... 4x683.webp![]()
![]()
I'm not on the pessimism that they aren't sure, pretty obvious they're just using it to see how much the car will be affected by the changes. Seems like the car is performing not that much different vs the older spec.Rootsap wrote: ↑17 May 2025, 00:56Or, they aren't completely sure the new FW will work as intendes so they're testing it now. If it doesn't work they can still use the old one and figure out what is wrong with the new spec
The pushrod is almost horizontal.Lasssept wrote: ↑16 May 2025, 22:46Autoracer
https://autoracer.it/wp-content/uploads ... 4x683.webp
Service access maybe.AR3-GP wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 14:31What is this lower inlet on the radiator duct for? Bypass?
https://i.postimg.cc/RhhhVH07/image.png