Indeed.Cs98 wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:00Or the checks found nothing, and the directive is just a clarification on something that was suspected/queried but not found. Similar to the Australia TD on mini-DRS.
Indeed.Cs98 wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:00Or the checks found nothing, and the directive is just a clarification on something that was suspected/queried but not found. Similar to the Australia TD on mini-DRS.
This was my impression during the whole weekend. For me it seemed that McLaren was a bit more average, rather than Red Bull exceptional. (for sure the upgrades helped).
Yeah The Race are always right! I guess we'll see upon review of more data across many GPCjC wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:17Sorry guys and gals, Red Bull just did a better job in Imola than McLaren did, rather than it being any TDs slowing McLaren down![]()
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia- ... en-battle/
It's not even the Race, that is McLaren saying that. And RB saying they think it's a strange coincidence. I'm inclined to believe McLaren were not affected, not because they said so but because of other circumstances. Teams are never affected when asked for comment.organic wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:25Yeah The Race are always right! I guess we'll see upon review of more data across many GPCjC wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:17Sorry guys and gals, Red Bull just did a better job in Imola than McLaren did, rather than it being any TDs slowing McLaren down![]()
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia- ... en-battle/
But it literally says Mclaren are adamant they didn’t have to change anything.organic wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:25Yeah The Race are always right! I guess we'll see upon review of more data across many GPCjC wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:17Sorry guys and gals, Red Bull just did a better job in Imola than McLaren did, rather than it being any TDs slowing McLaren down![]()
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia- ... en-battle/
McLaren said they didn't have to change anything after the Baku flexiwing saga too, but they evidently didCjC wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:35But it literally says Mclaren are adamant they didn’t have to change anything.organic wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:25Yeah The Race are always right! I guess we'll see upon review of more data across many GPCjC wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:17Sorry guys and gals, Red Bull just did a better job in Imola than McLaren did, rather than it being any TDs slowing McLaren down![]()
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/fia- ... en-battle/
Red Bull took an upgrade to Imola and it would seem to me that they have punched above Mclaren, currently making Max the favourite for the WDC.
Not that long ago Zak Brown said that any of the other top 3 teams are 1 upgrade away jumping Mclaren- up step Red Bull and they win the race.
There’s too much fixation on the Miami result- yes it’s a great result for us McLaren fans to savour but that will be an outlier for this season just like Singapore 2024 was.
Also surely it’s a sweeter deal to win a race/ the championship with both teams adhering to the same rules and just doing a better job?
This is not true. They admitted they changed their wings after talks with the FIA before the Singapore GP (which was the next race after Baku)organic wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:36McLaren said they didn't have to change anything after the Baku flexiwing saga too, but they evidently didCjC wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 21:35But it literally says Mclaren are adamant they didn’t have to change anything.
Red Bull took an upgrade to Imola and it would seem to me that they have punched above Mclaren, currently making Max the favourite for the WDC.
Not that long ago Zak Brown said that any of the other top 3 teams are 1 upgrade away jumping Mclaren- up step Red Bull and they win the race.
There’s too much fixation on the Miami result- yes it’s a great result for us McLaren fans to savour but that will be an outlier for this season just like Singapore 2024 was.
Also surely it’s a sweeter deal to win a race/ the championship with both teams adhering to the same rules and just doing a better job?
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... e_vignetteRed Bull technical director Pierre Waché had an explanation for why the heat didn't play into McLaren's hands on Sunday. "On certain types of asphalt with certain tire compounds, the tire wear mechanism changes in our favor in hot weather." The Frenchman declined to elaborate on the tire 101. "That would give too much away."
Better balance enlarges setup window. Red Bull has improved its much-maligned RB21 with its two-piece upgrade. The new underbody, which was already installed in Miami, delivers more stable downforce. The modified cooling intake optimizes the airflow around the sidepods, the modified rear wishbone fairings to the diffuser, and the new rear brake vents allow for better control of tire temperatures. "But it will take time until this works as well as it does at McLaren," fears Sporting Director Helmut Marko.
The impact of recent developments was felt by the drivers. The Red Bull no longer changed its balance between turn-in and the apex. The understeer mid-corner disappeared, but the oversteer on the exit remained. But Verstappen can live with that. "For the first time in a long time, Max hasn't complained," Marko said with a sigh of relief.
The champion praised: "The car was easier to control. This made it easier to manage the tires." Team principal Christian Horner explained that the improvements to the car expanded the setup window. Friday and Saturday were like night and day. This time, it was possible to find a good car setup and not just a half-baked compromise.
The decisive factor will be whether Imola, like Suzuka, was just a snapshot in time where the car benefited from favorable conditions or whether it will provide a better platform in the long term. Technical director Waché remains tight-lipped: "Am I confident now? I don't have an answer to that. I was after Suzuka, and then we were beaten by McLaren three times in a row."
This is one of the more sensible articles on here regarding the result.AR3-GP wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 22:16https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... e_vignetteRed Bull technical director Pierre Waché had an explanation for why the heat didn't play into McLaren's hands on Sunday. "On certain types of asphalt with certain tire compounds, the tire wear mechanism changes in our favor in hot weather." The Frenchman declined to elaborate on the tire 101. "That would give too much away."
Better balance enlarges setup window. Red Bull has improved its much-maligned RB21 with its two-piece upgrade. The new underbody, which was already installed in Miami, delivers more stable downforce. The modified cooling intake optimizes the airflow around the sidepods, the modified rear wishbone fairings to the diffuser, and the new rear brake vents allow for better control of tire temperatures. "But it will take time until this works as well as it does at McLaren," fears Sporting Director Helmut Marko.
The impact of recent developments was felt by the drivers. The Red Bull no longer changed its balance between turn-in and the apex. The understeer mid-corner disappeared, but the oversteer on the exit remained. But Verstappen can live with that. "For the first time in a long time, Max hasn't complained," Marko said with a sigh of relief.
The champion praised: "The car was easier to control. This made it easier to manage the tires." Team principal Christian Horner explained that the improvements to the car expanded the setup window. Friday and Saturday were like night and day. This time, it was possible to find a good car setup and not just a half-baked compromise.
The decisive factor will be whether Imola, like Suzuka, was just a snapshot in time where the car benefited from favorable conditions or whether it will provide a better platform in the long term. Technical director Waché remains tight-lipped: "Am I confident now? I don't have an answer to that. I was after Suzuka, and then we were beaten by McLaren three times in a row."