Nice job team. Upgrade worked and I did not expect anything else.
The pace will only improve with more understanding of the new suspension.
I would have thought Hungary would be a bad track with a mix of corners, lots of low-speed, long-radius corners. Charles was complaining about the low speed again today, but we will see next week. Probably Monza until we are going to be close again. Merc have fallen, and George even hinted the rear sus needs to be reverted post race, so Podiums are still an option, but the Hungaroring and Zandvoort aren't in my mind going to favour us. Happy to be wrong.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:32If you by winning mean finishing first behind the McLarens, then yes. With soaring temps and medium speed corners, the McLarens will be unbeatable.
Piastri was also literally in a race against someone in the same machinery and a tyre advantage - he was saving some tyre life in case he had to fight off Norris at the end and therefore managing his pace but, make no mistake, he was trying to complete the race in the fastest possible way. When the two of them are racing each other that’s actually the most representative we’ll see of their pace.dialtone wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:02Not really. He was managing tires like everyone before as he didn’t believe he could get to the end, like he said on the radio, his battery was full and certainly peak performance of the car is higher. But that’s not what race pace is.CjC wrote:Piastri’s personal best lap on the second to last lap is more telling than just an average
A 0 stopper race for dry tyres isn’t a true reflection of race pace either.dialtone wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:02Not really. He was managing tires like everyone before as he didn’t believe he could get to the end, like he said on the radio, his battery was full and certainly peak performance of the car is higher. But that’s not what race pace is.CjC wrote:Piastri’s personal best lap on the second to last lap is more telling than just an average
I’m not sure what that means exactly. People took the gap from the last 30ish laps and averaged. Others said the real gap is the single lap that Piastri did at the end. I’m sorry people are disappointed but taking the average of clean 30 laps of racing is a whole lot closer to the real race pace than anything I know.CjC wrote:A 0 stopper race for dry tyres isn’t a true reflection of race pace either.dialtone wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:02Not really. He was managing tires like everyone before as he didn’t believe he could get to the end, like he said on the radio, his battery was full and certainly peak performance of the car is higher. But that’s not what race pace is.CjC wrote:Piastri’s personal best lap on the second to last lap is more telling than just an average
Albano coming through with the Ferrari cope/propaganda. Not unexpected.
If I were Piastri I would also lose 1s per lap from my team mate on better tires for each of the last 10 laps. Makes the racing more comfortable.AR3-GP wrote:Albano coming through with the Ferrari cope/propaganda. Not unexpected.
Is he going to ignore that Piastri suddenly showed a lot more speed in the last 5 laps? Everything that we can see shows evidence that Piastri was playing into the gap he had to Norris more than anything, only going as fast as necessary.
I agree is a fair sample to take, 30 laps on one set of medium tyres- it’s an easy equation.dialtone wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:59I’m not sure what that means exactly. People took the gap from the last 30ish laps and averaged. Others said the real gap is the single lap that Piastri did at the end. I’m sorry people are disappointed but taking the average of clean 30 laps of racing is a whole lot closer to the real race pace than anything I know.CjC wrote:A 0 stopper race for dry tyres isn’t a true reflection of race pace either.
Everyone managed tires but everyone was pushing as much as they could because of Lando and Max.
AR3-GP wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:59Albano coming through with the Ferrari cope/propaganda. Not unexpected.
Is he going to ignore that Piastri suddenly showed a lot more speed in the last 5 laps? Everything that we can see shows evidence that Piastri was playing into the gap he had to Norris more than anything, only going as fast as necessary since he wasn't sure if the tires would make it. He had pace in hand.
Lando Norris was on the hardest compound in the range, completely unfit for this track, let alone 25C track temps and was burning up the track even ith mistakes. The gap is not .13 tenths no matter which Italian twitter propaganda page says that it was. It may be closer to 1.3 than it is to .13
There's a lot of people around including drivers who have to lie to themselves because Mclaren's real advantage means you shouldn't bother at all.
https://i.postimg.cc/gJgm9T5V/image.png
Space-heat wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:34The rear seems to have been a jump. The only caveat to the debate regarding MCL's pace is that MCL sacrificed some setup to prepare for the wet conditions (as Charles himself stated).
Laps 39-43 of Piastri:AR3-GP wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 21:59Is he going to ignore that Piastri suddenly showed a lot more speed in the last 5 laps? Everything that we can see shows evidence that Piastri was playing into the gap he had to Norris more than anything, only going as fast as necessary since he wasn't sure if the tires would make it. He had pace in hand.
Hungary will suit Mclaren better than almost any track on the calendar.