First I've seen of strake on the underside of footplate in this reg
Will be a staple on all cars shortly
First I've seen of strake on the underside of footplate in this reg
That is also my understanding (and, even if the contention is that the FTM takes away some power, that’s not the same as drag).SiLo wrote: ↑11 Jun 2026, 00:13It’s underpowered not draggyf1316 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2026, 00:06There’s that big ol’ vane Lewis was saying they were missing - let’s see if it actually makes a big difference.Luscion wrote: ↑10 Jun 2026, 16:36New front wing at Barcelona https://autoracer.it/ferrari-ecco-le-pr ... lla-sf-26/
Separately, I keep hearing Jonathan Noble (and only him) saying that the Ferrari is “draggy”. I’ll be curious to see if any of this package looks like it relates to drag reduction as I’ve not heard anyone else say that.
More o less the other teams bring the same effects with the main plane, bring more air under the floor but in my opinion this is more draggy.
It would appear to be a series of vortex generators (and is reminiscient of the strakes under the previous generation of cars). The air will naturally be flowing inwards there as the front wing is lifting air and causing a local reduced pressure zone. Roll up a series of vortices that, presumably, then add together (as they will be rotating in the same direction and similar vortices are additive) to run around the inside face of the front tyre. Running a vortex around the inside of the tyre shoulder will help to "hoover up" the turbulence coming from the tyre squirt. The vanes above the footplate (and the new vane on the endplate) will likewise be rolling up vortices that run around the outer face of the tyre for the same reason - to clean up the wake.
I think it's because under the footplate the air is clean so they want to bring it inwash, as much as possible under the floor of the car rather than outwash it away from the front wheels, which is instead done at the upper side of the footplate.
It appears they outwash the air above the footplate and inwash it below. That allows control of more of the tyre wake and likely interacts with the bargeboard-type devices on the front corner of the floor.
Opinions are just like that. Not facts.
Norris explicitly said, Ferrari choose a more draggy solution (overall) for their cars, for more downforce.f1316 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2026, 01:16That is also my understanding (and, even if the contention is that the FTM takes away some power, that’s not the same as drag).SiLo wrote: ↑11 Jun 2026, 00:13It’s underpowered not draggyf1316 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2026, 00:06
There’s that big ol’ vane Lewis was saying they were missing - let’s see if it actually makes a big difference.
Separately, I keep hearing Jonathan Noble (and only him) saying that the Ferrari is “draggy”. I’ll be curious to see if any of this package looks like it relates to drag reduction as I’ve not heard anyone else say that.
But that’s what he’s said several times and I tend to think he’s reasonably reliable, so just curious.