yeah, missing FP1 doesn't matter and since when start position is getting decided by FP
This tbh. Forget about Lewis, Charles makes these mistakes too often throughout his career. There’s no use being fast but erratic because that’ll never mean a world championship. He needs to be consistent, even if that comes from losing a tenth here or there - he needs better judgement for the limit. The worst part is that this often happens when a good result is on the table and we’re left with “what ifs?”.
I suspect it's for the same reason that Hamilton beating a bunch of WDCs in the same machinery is described as beating 'mediocre teammates'. It's probably also the same reason that people compare Bottas with Perez to show how bad Hamilton is rather than comparing, say, Ricciardo with Alonso, Button, etc. I'll leave you to work out what that reason is likely to be...Gillian wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:39This is overlooked to the extend you start to wonder if it is deliberateArtur Craft wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:22So, when Hamilton had equal or slightly better pace on the race, you claim he had "much better" pace. When Leclerc destroyed him, you claim Hamilton had an engine problem or whatever...rifrafs2kees wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:01
Let's review race results:
- Australia: Hamilton had much better pace.
- China: Hamilton had better pace.
- Japan: Leclerc had much better pace, particularly on the straights. Take it for what it's worth.
- Miami: Leclerc had much better pace but then dropped it. Had Hamilton not had damage from Colapinto, he'd have had an even better result differential.
- Canada: Hamilton had much, much better pace.
for the fastest Q1, but he was likely to bin and he did.
- Monaco: Only qualifying matters; Hamilton was faster. I contend that Leclerc's knife's edge effort was the only reason
- Spain: He binned it again while Hamilton was on course to set a purple in sector 1.
![]()
These last years have been horrible to you, I imagine. Leclerc and Russell beaten Hamilton by big margins most of the time and on the very few times Hamilton was quicker, it was by very small margins. Very devastating for people who pushed narratives about him when he had a car several seconds faster than the second one and mediocre team mates giving him big trouble, one of which is getting destroyed by Verstappen former team mate, who was said to be the slowest of the grid by the very same people who pushed thoses "hype" narratives about the most succesful driver ever![]()
Bottas vs Perez is definitely off topic and I’m sorry to bring it up but to me it is one of the great anomalies this season. Their prior records would indicate Bottas is the better qualifier. But yet somehow Perez is destroying him in quali and race this year. I don’t think that is going to continue all year. Something is amiss there even though I have no clue what it could be.Artur Craft wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 19:04Hamilton is doing fine, better than before, obviously. If that is the reason for Leclerc´s mistakes, then I can´t know for sure but further GPs will give better understanding about that.rifrafs2kees wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:30
Dude, it's not about Hamilton. Leclerc isn't doing well!!!!.
![]()
What I said is very objective and clear. People said Bottas was one of the best drivers ever over one lap to support narratives about Hamilton. Likewise, Perez was said to be mega slow to support narratives about Verstappen. Now we´re seeing Perez being speculated to go to a better team than Cadilac while Bottas is on the verge of ending his F1 carreer because he is just too slow. Maybe you have not been following what is being said on the media about Caddie drivers....
I know Perez and Bottas are off topic here but it does make one think that(both) Ferrari´s drivers might not be as good as Mercedes´, Red Bull´s and Mclaren´s, not just lacking on the engine side.(just my impression anyway)
I did not know Ricciardo was teammates with Alonso and Button?Wynters wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 20:24I suspect it's for the same reason that Hamilton beating a bunch of WDCs in the same machinery is described as beating 'mediocre teammates'. It's probably also the same reason that people compare Bottas with Perez to show how bad Hamilton is rather than comparing, say, Ricciardo with Alonso, Button, etc. I'll leave you to work out what that reason is likely to be...Gillian wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:39This is overlooked to the extend you start to wonder if it is deliberateArtur Craft wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:22
So, when Hamilton had equal or slightly better pace on the race, you claim he had "much better" pace. When Leclerc destroyed him, you claim Hamilton had an engine problem or whatever...![]()
These last years have been horrible to you, I imagine. Leclerc and Russell beaten Hamilton by big margins most of the time and on the very few times Hamilton was quicker, it was by very small margins. Very devastating for people who pushed narratives about him when he had a car several seconds faster than the second one and mediocre team mates giving him big trouble, one of which is getting destroyed by Verstappen former team mate, who was said to be the slowest of the grid by the very same people who pushed thoses "hype" narratives about the most succesful driver ever![]()
Totally.Frankly, Ferrari have done a great job to have two drivers with different qualities who are competitive with each other.
Depends on the driver, Lewis likes to get out on the track and experiment with the car to fine tune his setup. So for sure he was hindered by some amount, but every driver was hindered to some extent because of the track temp and the tires not lasting long at all.Artur Craft wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 18:08It seems FP1 missing meant next to nothing. Norris and Hulk were quicker than their team mates the whole weekend, despite missing FP1.
Yea the fact that the car hit the highest top speed of any car today says a lot about the upgrades they brought, cant wait till they have the upgraded engine, which hopefully if reports are true could be the next race comingLM10 wrote: ↑13 Jun 2026, 21:09Wow, what mixed feelings I have about this qualifying!
Very positive about the amazing job the team has done, once again showing how strong that car is and especially making the mega upgrade work. Being that fast on this track is, as we know, a really good sign.
Hamilton keeps getting better and more comfortable with the car. Should have even taken pole.
As for Leclerc’s crash… this time, I’m afraid it was all on him. He pushed a little bit too much there. Really frustrating…
It was Ferrari’s pole to lose - with such a big power deficit. Let that sink in. Bravissimo, team!