Just remember that Mercedes are still racing their "2.0" car and another big upgrade must be coming at some point.
Leclerc is completely lost.
First time in his career he seems to not be able to extract the maximum from the car he is given.
In my opinion, the setup of the car was fundamentally wrong. Lewis complained very early on that the car was oversteering everywhere.Gillian wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:59I watched the entire race and I was a bit baffled. Hamilton looked really strong early on until... he didn't. Tires really fell of a cliff it seems. Bit of a hail mary to pit Hamilton during VSC for softs. Did not really work out (doh). Leclerc looked a bit slow from the start tbh. Power deficit was pretty clear imo (clearest it has been to me anyway). It was a weird race for Ferrari, a lot worse than I expected.Artur Craft wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:40guess why?
What did he do? I only watched the last 25 laps.
Hard for me to say anything about the race but, going by the results, without proper context, it seems Ferrari is back at 4th car place. Red Bull took a big jump with their updated car and threatened Mercedes while doing the same strategy (2 stops) and no VSC fluke, unlike Ferrari.
Red Bull had a very poor car at the first few races (bar Melbourne) and was fighting Audi.Now they are fighting Mercedes while Ferrari is not improving enough.
Over the years, it has been shown that Red Bull and Mclaren are the teams that are most capable of in-season development while Ferrari tends to start well and then fails to update the cars in a satisfying pace. Silverstone will paint a clearer picture but the trend seems to be continuing...
Hamilton was ok until he swapped on to the hard tyre. Then he struggled for pace. The switch to the used soft seemed to be a roll of the dice. It sort of worked but once back on to the hard for the last stint the pace went away again.Gillian wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:59
I watched the entire race and I was a bit baffled. Hamilton looked really strong early on until... he didn't. Tires really fell of a cliff it seems. Bit of a hail mary to pit Hamilton during VSC for softs. Did not really work out (doh). Leclerc looked a bit slow from the start tbh. Power deficit was pretty clear imo (clearest it has been to me anyway). It was a weird race for Ferrari, a lot worse than I expected.
Some people have had bans which obviously keeps one away...
Those are great for any car, in general, but I don´t see how they can be the dominant factors responsible for great traction. I would say those would mostly impact cornering, an area in which Ferrari´s car seem to excel this yearrifrafs2kees wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 16:40This car hasn't offered credible challenge on traction-dependent and power tracks. Not sure what mechanical attributes yield great traction...low cg, low moment of inertia along x,y,z axis?
It seems it made very little difference for those who took it.
Did you get banned ?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 18:31Some people have had bans which obviously keeps one away...![]()
No, I did not try to explain, I still 100% stand by it. It is you who can not stop insulting, which is a clear sign of a weak mind and bad intention. There were nothing which even proved or meant I was writing anything wrong...mzso wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:09I precisely understand that you were talking nonsense, then trying to explain it away.
Yeah, twice and for much longer than 3 months. So I now partake less than I used to which I'm sure many won't be too sad about.
Yeah, twice and for much longer than 3 months. So I now partake less than I used to which I'm sure many won't be too sad about.
It kinda felt like watching Miami and Suzuka again. The SF-26 when it can keep its rear tyres in the window is a race car as good as any on the grid but once it overheats them the pace simply drops off a cliff. A feature of these regs is that once you start having wheelspin and sliding it's compounded because you can't recover energy, you can't deploy energy, you lose even more lap time than the simple thermal deg would suggest and it's a vicious cycle.Gillian wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:59I watched the entire race and I was a bit baffled. Hamilton looked really strong early on until... he didn't. Tires really fell of a cliff it seems. Bit of a hail mary to pit Hamilton during VSC for softs. Did not really work out (doh). Leclerc looked a bit slow from the start tbh. Power deficit was pretty clear imo (clearest it has been to me anyway). It was a weird race for Ferrari, a lot worse than I expected.
It is very odd because both ferrari drivers prefer the harder of the tyres because the both lean on the tyre more. The harder tyres today seemed a step backwards for them. Weird.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 18:28Hamilton was ok until he swapped on to the hard tyre. Then he struggled for pace. The switch to the used soft seemed to be a roll of the dice. It sort of worked but once back on to the hard for the last stint the pace went away again.Gillian wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:59
I watched the entire race and I was a bit baffled. Hamilton looked really strong early on until... he didn't. Tires really fell of a cliff it seems. Bit of a hail mary to pit Hamilton during VSC for softs. Did not really work out (doh). Leclerc looked a bit slow from the start tbh. Power deficit was pretty clear imo (clearest it has been to me anyway). It was a weird race for Ferrari, a lot worse than I expected.
Leclerc seemingly took some front wing damage from contact with Piastri although he didn't look quick enough before them either. He's having one of those periods of "the car doesn't suit me" that hits all drivers at some point and sees them struggle for pace - amazing how you can lose half a second of pace because you don't feel at one with the car, but it happens all the time. I expect he'll come back pretty soon.
Yeah you're probably right, that sums it up pretty much.dans79 wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 18:25In my opinion, the setup of the car was fundamentally wrong. Lewis complained very early on that the car was oversteering everywhere.Gillian wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:59I watched the entire race and I was a bit baffled. Hamilton looked really strong early on until... he didn't. Tires really fell of a cliff it seems. Bit of a hail mary to pit Hamilton during VSC for softs. Did not really work out (doh). Leclerc looked a bit slow from the start tbh. Power deficit was pretty clear imo (clearest it has been to me anyway). It was a weird race for Ferrari, a lot worse than I expected.Artur Craft wrote: ↑28 Jun 2026, 17:40
guess why?![]()
What did he do? I only watched the last 25 laps.
Hard for me to say anything about the race but, going by the results, without proper context, it seems Ferrari is back at 4th car place. Red Bull took a big jump with their updated car and threatened Mercedes while doing the same strategy (2 stops) and no VSC fluke, unlike Ferrari.
Red Bull had a very poor car at the first few races (bar Melbourne) and was fighting Audi.Now they are fighting Mercedes while Ferrari is not improving enough.
Over the years, it has been shown that Red Bull and Mclaren are the teams that are most capable of in-season development while Ferrari tends to start well and then fails to update the cars in a satisfying pace. Silverstone will paint a clearer picture but the trend seems to be continuing...
They took two or three graduations of front Wing out with each stop,
They made Lewis switch to a lower engine mode several times because of heat concerns.
And it didn't seem like they could fully get the hards in the window on any stint.