So being by far the worst car is the best thing to happen?
So being by far the worst car is the best thing to happen?
yes building on poor processes, poor correlation across sim, cfd, etc etc will not net you a championship winning car. they might be able to scrape by with a competitive car, but not a championship car.
How did you come to that conclusion? They started disastrously in 2015, and it took to around 2020 for them to be comparable to Mercedes.Waz wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 17:00If they were throwing upgrades chasing performance, it would be a concern for everyone, but all the changes made to the car have been to identify and address reliability problems.
There's no reason a team of this caliber with the facilities they have would need 3 or 4 years to deliver a good car.
Also, everyone knows the targets now for the PU. Honda showed in 2018 that they are capable of delivering a competitive PU in a year.
It's also possible that the embarrassment and humiliation of being this poor is breeding a toxic work culture that will damage the company for years to come. It's rarely good to be bad unless your sport has a draft system for young talent, and even then losing habits can be difficult to shake. Theres a lot of pressure on this Hungary update; if it doesn't deliver them to striking distance of the midfield, morale will crater.604gtir wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 18:29
yes building on poor processes, poor correlation across sim, cfd, etc etc will not net you a championship winning car. they might be able to scrape by with a competitive car, but not a championship car.
it forces them to reevaluate and change, which they may have not done if they were midfieldish.
The trap that the regs put Honda into for 2015 and 2016 is well documented. Go read about it.avada wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 22:27How did you come to that conclusion? They started disastrously in 2015, and it took to around 2020 for them to be comparable to Mercedes.Waz wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 17:00If they were throwing upgrades chasing performance, it would be a concern for everyone, but all the changes made to the car have been to identify and address reliability problems.
There's no reason a team of this caliber with the facilities they have would need 3 or 4 years to deliver a good car.
Also, everyone knows the targets now for the PU. Honda showed in 2018 that they are capable of delivering a competitive PU in a year.
well you're entitled to your opinion and as am I. New processes, new software, correlation and maturation of everything takes time, its not a flick of a switch. Sure they can be near the front of the midfield within the year, but to win a championship, well would be short of a miracle if they're using jordan age'd process and tools as recent as a few months ago.diffuser wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 13:11I don't agree.
It's pretty well documented that the chassis poor start was caused by Newey's and Cardile's late arrival/hiring. You can add the disorganized state they were in before Newey's arrival. In regards to Honda's poor start I put that on Honda being unprepared going into the new regs, and AMR for the poor management of the PU integration. So maybe they learned something about PU integration and management.
As Pedro de la Rosa put it, the facilities are now finally in place for the talent to realize their true potential. He put it quite poignantly - that no one other than Newey had the will to change things around where it needed to be. Where others gave up or said it was too big an undertaking, I presume Cowell/Whitmarsh, Newey made it a point to see them through.Waz wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 17:00If they were throwing upgrades chasing performance, it would be a concern for everyone, but all the changes made to the car have been to identify and address reliability problems.
There's no reason a team of this caliber with the facilities they have would need 3 or 4 years to deliver a good car.
Also, everyone knows the targets now for the PU. Honda showed in 2018 that they are capable of delivering a competitive PU in a year.
When you bring in a Newey and Cardile. Processes are going to change. So that was already going on...They fired 7-8 people last year.604gtir wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 09:03well you're entitled to your opinion and as am I. New processes, new software, correlation and maturation of everything takes time, its not a flick of a switch. Sure they can be near the front of the midfield within the year, but to win a championship, well would be short of a miracle if they're using jordan age'd process and tools as recent as a few months ago.diffuser wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 13:11I don't agree.
It's pretty well documented that the chassis poor start was caused by Newey's and Cardile's late arrival/hiring. You can add the disorganized state they were in before Newey's arrival. In regards to Honda's poor start I put that on Honda being unprepared going into the new regs, and AMR for the poor management of the PU integration. So maybe they learned something about PU integration and management.
i would very much love it if they were instant championship contenders overnight, but i feel this isnt possible.
What trap? They the full 2015 for unlimited spending and testing, while the others were racing and were subject to update quotas. And the partnership was was announced in 2013. And they weren't in F1 so had no V8 engine to maintain and develop. But had info on other manufacturer's performance and some of their technical solutions, like the split turbo.diffuser wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 03:50The trap that the regs put Honda into for 2015 and 2016 is well documented. Go read about it.avada wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 22:27How did you come to that conclusion? They started disastrously in 2015, and it took to around 2020 for them to be comparable to Mercedes.Waz wrote: ↑13 Jul 2026, 17:00If they were throwing upgrades chasing performance, it would be a concern for everyone, but all the changes made to the car have been to identify and address reliability problems.
There's no reason a team of this caliber with the facilities they have would need 3 or 4 years to deliver a good car.
Also, everyone knows the targets now for the PU. Honda showed in 2018 that they are capable of delivering a competitive PU in a year.
Well the narrative is almost the same. Only now they're waiting for the second spec chassis, rather than next year's.3_12_14_16_22_33_81 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 10:39I'm keeping expectations low. Look at Williams. James Vowles threw away last year in an effort to focus on the current regulations. He convinced most of us last year with his lengthy reasoning and explanations. Coming from a team that has won multiple championships, who would doubt his plan. Look at them now. They are barely in front of Cadillac.
I really hope this team can produce something special though.
In 2015, they discovered that the ICE's compressor was undersized. They soon realized they couldn't make it any larger because the turbocharger's compressor was located in the middle of the ICE. To increase its size, they would have had to move it out of the middle, but doing so would have required redesigning the cylinder heads, intake, and exhaust. The rules only allowed them to change two of those components. Of course, you can't move the intake ports on a cylinder head without also moving the exhaust ports. They pushed to have the rules changed, but that didn't happen until 2017. Which is when they released the completely redesign PU.avada wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 14:33What trap? They the full 2015 for unlimited spending and testing, while the others were racing and were subject to update quotas. And the partnership was was announced in 2013. And they weren't in F1 so had no V8 engine to maintain and develop. But had info on other manufacturer's performance and some of their technical solutions, like the split turbo.
The way I see it they had the best circumstances. But they spectacularly botched it.
If they only found out in 2015 it says a lot about the quality of their development process. None of it good.diffuser wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 16:03In 2015, they discovered that the ICE's compressor was undersized. They soon realized they couldn't make it any larger because the turbocharger's compressor was located in the middle of the ICE. To increase its size, they would have had to move it out of the middle, but doing so would have required redesigning the cylinder heads, intake, and exhaust. The rules only allowed them to change two of those components. Of course, you can't move the intake ports on a cylinder head without also moving the exhaust ports. They pushed to have the rules changed, but that didn't happen until 2017. Which is when they released the completely redesign PU.
You forget they only decided in late 2013 that they were going back into F1 and we're begged to go in for 2015 by McLaren, when Honda wanted to wait another year. McLaren, who's Merc contract had expired in 2014, needed a PU.avada wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 18:18If they only found out in 2015 it says a lot about the quality of their development process. None of it good.diffuser wrote: ↑14 Jul 2026, 16:03In 2015, they discovered that the ICE's compressor was undersized. They soon realized they couldn't make it any larger because the turbocharger's compressor was located in the middle of the ICE. To increase its size, they would have had to move it out of the middle, but doing so would have required redesigning the cylinder heads, intake, and exhaust. The rules only allowed them to change two of those components. Of course, you can't move the intake ports on a cylinder head without also moving the exhaust ports. They pushed to have the rules changed, but that didn't happen until 2017. Which is when they released the completely redesign PU.
I remember being optimistic about Honda. A whole year to themselves, unlimited development and testing. At that time I think they could have even tested on track in a chassis since they weren't a part of the championship yet. (And not secretly like Ferrari)
They failed massively of course.
I wouldn't even call it a trap. More like a pit they dug themselves into.