I think it is done for stiffness reasons.FNTC wrote: ↑24 Jul 2026, 22:38I'm just saying if you remove that top carbon fibre bow, the mechanics of the wing remains the same, look at it:
https://iili.io/COyzL42.png
Unless its aero related I think the only reason is the top wing element fails its flex test or something without it.
Old one for comparison:FNTC wrote: ↑24 Jul 2026, 22:38I'm just saying if you remove that top carbon fibre bow, the mechanics of the wing remains the same, look at it:
https://iili.io/COyzL42.png
Unless its aero related I think the only reason is the top wing element fails its flex test or something without it.

Might be a clue here. Replacing that metal arm with this carbon bow could be in conjunction with the massive weight-saving program, trading a tiny bit of aero efficiency to pull as much weight out of the assembly as possible without compromising structural integrity. And they can stick a bunch of winglets on later. That's my best guess.
Yes, if I'm actually being serious, I did wonder if that is used with flow viz. I don't know. Plus some of the car is black, plus it's a different green.
If it was a problem, there are othere colors of flow-vis. I remember seeing orange and red flow-vis.bigblue wrote: ↑25 Jul 2026, 09:28Yes, if I'm actually being serious, I did wonder if that is used with flow viz. I don't know. Plus some of the car is black, plus it's a different green.
If they were going for UV lights they would be using paint transparent in the optical range, so no-one else could see the flow around the car.