Aston Martin AMR26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
FNTC
FNTC
25
Joined: 03 Nov 2023, 21:27

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post


User avatar
AR3-GP
629
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

FNTC wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 22:38
I'm just saying if you remove that top carbon fibre bow, the mechanics of the wing remains the same, look at it:
https://iili.io/COyzL42.png
Unless its aero related I think the only reason is the top wing element fails its flex test or something without it.
I think it is done for stiffness reasons.
Beware of T-Rex

FNTC
FNTC
25
Joined: 03 Nov 2023, 21:27

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

FNTC wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 22:38
I'm just saying if you remove that top carbon fibre bow, the mechanics of the wing remains the same, look at it:
https://iili.io/COyzL42.png
Unless its aero related I think the only reason is the top wing element fails its flex test or something without it.
Old one for comparison:
Image

Just a metal arm there, no big bow over the top.

Brahmal
Brahmal
89
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

FNTC wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 23:11

Just a metal arm there, no big bow over the top.
Might be a clue here. Replacing that metal arm with this carbon bow could be in conjunction with the massive weight-saving program, trading a tiny bit of aero efficiency to pull as much weight out of the assembly as possible without compromising structural integrity. And they can stick a bunch of winglets on later. That's my best guess.

muzzytt
muzzytt
0
Joined: 04 Jan 2012, 06:26

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

I'm sure they could have made a carbon arm without the need for the bow.
It could be for a future upgrade coming in Dutch grand prix
Last edited by muzzytt on 25 Jul 2026, 09:41, edited 1 time in total.

OnEcRiTiCaL
OnEcRiTiCaL
0
Joined: 01 Aug 2023, 09:55

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

bigblue wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 19:55
Another fatal flaw of the AMR26, it's green so they can't see the flow viz. No wonder they have problems. Rookie error!
Uv light genius?

User avatar
bigblue
24
Joined: 01 Oct 2014, 12:18

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

OnEcRiTiCaL wrote:
25 Jul 2026, 08:39
bigblue wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 19:55
Another fatal flaw of the AMR26, it's green so they can't see the flow viz. No wonder they have problems. Rookie error!
Uv light genius?
Yes, if I'm actually being serious, I did wonder if that is used with flow viz. I don't know. Plus some of the car is black, plus it's a different green.

User avatar
diffuser
258
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

bigblue wrote:
25 Jul 2026, 09:28
OnEcRiTiCaL wrote:
25 Jul 2026, 08:39
bigblue wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 19:55
Another fatal flaw of the AMR26, it's green so they can't see the flow viz. No wonder they have problems. Rookie error!
Uv light genius?
Yes, if I'm actually being serious, I did wonder if that is used with flow viz. I don't know. Plus some of the car is black, plus it's a different green.
If it was a problem, there are othere colors of flow-vis. I remember seeing orange and red flow-vis.

avada
avada
0
Joined: 04 Jul 2026, 15:17

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

OnEcRiTiCaL wrote:
25 Jul 2026, 08:39
bigblue wrote:
24 Jul 2026, 19:55
Another fatal flaw of the AMR26, it's green so they can't see the flow viz. No wonder they have problems. Rookie error!
Uv light genius?
If they were going for UV lights they would be using paint transparent in the optical range, so no-one else could see the flow around the car.