This bit is worthy of note:
Button called the pit-stop for tyres. Not the team.
No No i can't possibly know what you know to guage what i knowDiesel wrote:
They were all managing the pace to make the tyres last, if they had pushed harder they would have worn out. The big question was would a new set of tyres be faster to the finish line than a managed worn set. We all know the answer.
On paper a new set was probably faster which is why McLaren made the call.
But hey you clearly know more than me, so when is your next race?
What must poor Seb Vettel do to win a race? This time it was a wheel coming loose probably due to a bearing or other component failure.Diesel wrote:Webber was driving like a rookie today - I'd argue he does most days!
The Red Bull is the same old same old - fast but just can't do the distance.
Alonso hearing about hamilton on the radio made me laugh "please, i don't want to know!"
Great race!
Alonso made the error in Turn 1, Button could not just stand on the brake, who knows what carnage that would have unleashed behind.WhiteBlue wrote: Button was lucky to survive his optimistic first corner move and again by surviving aquaplaning in the pitlane on slicks and going off in turn 3. The following stint was a masterly demonstration what race craft can achieve under the new rules. So the fundation was lucky but the victory was earned by his ability to emulate the professor Prost in looking after his tyres.
It was more raping that the vatican scandals. (no offense to Catholics)ISLAMATRON wrote:Hamilton passed Button just before Button pitted... it was nasty too... Hamilton passed so many diffeent drivers in so many different ways it was rediculous. And real cars(Webber, Massa, Rosberg) not backmarkers like Aonso was passing.ringo wrote:Hamilton mass raped the field today, Button was the only one that escaped. Kubica was lucky as well.
How could that possibly be Button's fault? Button had the line and Alonso turned in on him. Even Martin said during the race it was 0% Button's fault.WhiteBlue wrote:Button was lucky to survive his optimistic first corner move and again by surviving aquaplaning in the pitlane on slicks and going off in turn 3. The following stint was a masterly demonstration what race craft can achieve under the new rules. So the fundation was lucky but the victory was earned by his ability to emulate the professor Prost in looking after his tyres.Diesel wrote:Webber was driving like a rookie today - I'd argue he does most days!
The Red Bull is the same old same old - fast but just can't do the distance.
Alonso hearing about hamilton on the radio made me laugh "please, i don't want to know!"
Great race!
You need to watch that scene again. Button was half a car length behind Alonso. So how can he have a racing line there? If anybody was to blame at least percentage wise it was Button. Alonso had practically no room to give up. All in all I agree with the stewards that it was a racing accident. It just bugs me that the guy who had the biggest part in bringing it on was the luckiest in avoiding consequences.freedom_honda wrote:How could that possibly be Button's fault? Button had the line and Alonso turned in on him. Even Martin said during the race it was 0% Button's fault.WhiteBlue wrote:Button was lucky to survive his optimistic first corner move and again by surviving aquaplaning in the pitlane on slicks and going off in turn 3. The following stint was a masterly demonstration what race craft can achieve under the new rules. So the fundation was lucky but the victory was earned by his ability to emulate the professor Prost in looking after his tyres.Diesel wrote:Webber was driving like a rookie today - I'd argue he does most days!
The Red Bull is the same old same old - fast but just can't do the distance.
Alonso hearing about hamilton on the radio made me laugh "please, i don't want to know!"
Great race!
It continues to amazes me people always disregard Button's driving/effort no matter how well he does.
Go speak to some ex drivers, they all disagree with you.WhiteBlue wrote: You need to watch that scene again. Button was half a car length behind Alonso. So how can he have a racing line there? If anybody was to blame at least percentage wise it was Button. Alonso had practically no room to give up. All in all I agree with the stewards that it was a racing accident. It just bugs me that the guy who had the biggest part in bringing it on was the luckiest in avoiding consequences.
Killing two sets of tyres in process.ISLAMATRON wrote:Hamilton passed Button just before Button pitted... it was nasty too... Hamilton passed so many diffeent drivers in so many different ways it was rediculous. And real cars(Webber, Massa, Rosberg) not backmarkers like Aonso was passing.ringo wrote:Hamilton mass raped the field today, Button was the only one that escaped. Kubica was lucky as well.
And also - he didn't benefit from the incident?Diesel wrote:Go speak to some ex drivers, they all disagree with you.WhiteBlue wrote: You need to watch that scene again. Button was half a car length behind Alonso. So how can he have a racing line there? If anybody was to blame at least percentage wise it was Button. Alonso had practically no room to give up. All in all I agree with the stewards that it was a racing accident. It just bugs me that the guy who had the biggest part in bringing it on was the luckiest in avoiding consequences.