Back markers

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: back markers

Post

Also, a backmarker two laps down in Monaco has all the reasons to race, specially this year. For Lutus, Virgin and Hispania, any point they pick is likely to mean 10th position and a lot of money at the end of the year. And if, as it is most likely, none picks a point, then the 10th position will go to whoever get a 11th position. And if not a 12th and so on.
In Monaco cars crash, so 2 laps down you are easily 20th, or 18th, or even 16th... what if later it starts to rain and more cars crash? This could be the race deciding the team's classification at the end of the year, and just staying in the race has a lot of value. If you are a Lotus 2 laps down, you want to run like hell to stay ahead of that Virgin 2 and a half laps down!
TANSTAAFL

CMSMJ1
CMSMJ1
Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2007, 10:51
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: back markers

Post

I think the slow guys should race their race. If the fast guys want to pass them then tye had better hope for some co-operation. If not, I don't mind. It is part of the game.

I race motorcycles..and am not very fast..lol...so when the extremely fast guys ceom to lap me I don't do anything different. If they have the pace to catchn up 2 miles on me in 15 minutes then they can pass me at their own expense - I won't be moving or slowing for them.

I know F1 is not the same...but the principle is. fast guys need to learn to pass the slow guys and the slow guys need to carry on and not put themselves off the track to get out of the way.
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

010010011010
010010011010
0
Joined: 22 Aug 2009, 02:41

Re: back markers

Post

CMSMJ1 wrote:I think the slow guys should race their race. If the fast guys want to pass them then tye had better hope for some co-operation. If not, I don't mind. It is part of the game.

I race motorcycles..and am not very fast..lol...so when the extremely fast guys ceom to lap me I don't do anything different. If they have the pace to catchn up 2 miles on me in 15 minutes then they can pass me at their own expense - I won't be moving or slowing for them.

I know F1 is not the same...but the principle is. fast guys need to learn to pass the slow guys and the slow guys need to carry on and not put themselves off the track to get out of the way.
But they have to get off line

Caito
Caito
13
Joined: 16 Jun 2009, 05:30
Location: Switzerland

Re: back markers

Post

Watching some stats. More or less 14 cars finish the race at monaco.

More specifically in 2004 just 9 cars ended the race. So that would mean that there's a (although light) chance that just by finishing you could score points.
http://www.f1db.com/exec/section/grandp ... sification

13 finished 2003
12 finished 2002
10 finished 2001
10 finished 2000
14 finished 2008
18 finished 2007
16 finished 2006
14 finished 2005


There's hope for Lotus(the best of the new teams), and probably a big one, that they could score some points.

Points == Money

Bye!
Come back 747, we miss you!!

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: back markers

Post

Caito wrote:Points == Money

Bye!
Yes, verily. But let us not forget, that mo' money = mo' problems.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: back markers

Post

Also...

Less money = mo' problems.
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

CMSMJ1
CMSMJ1
Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2007, 10:51
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom

Re: back markers

Post

010010011010 wrote:
CMSMJ1 wrote:I think the slow guys should race their race. If the fast guys want to pass them then tye had better hope for some co-operation. If not, I don't mind. It is part of the game.

I race motorcycles..and am not very fast..lol...so when the extremely fast guys ceom to lap me I don't do anything different. If they have the pace to catchn up 2 miles on me in 15 minutes then they can pass me at their own expense - I won't be moving or slowing for them.

I know F1 is not the same...but the principle is. fast guys need to learn to pass the slow guys and the slow guys need to carry on and not put themselves off the track to get out of the way.
But they have to get off line
So what? They have to get off line to make a pass whoever it is they are going to overtake.

They have it too easy in a lot of respects... 8)
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM

User avatar
jon-mullen
1
Joined: 10 Sep 2008, 02:56
Location: Big Blue Nation

Re: Back markers

Post

Not the most exciting question of the weekend, I know, but if anyone was wondering if the new teams are catching up, it appears that they certainly are. This is a comparison of their Q1 times to the best Q1 time.

(The 107% is on there for reference, but applying the rule the way it is written to the past few years' quali format is a little...wonky.)

Image

It looks to me like they're steadily improving but struggling at some tracks more than others, maybe for lack of data or lack of downforce.
Loud idiot in red since 2010
United States Grand Prix Club, because there's more to racing than NASCAR

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Back markers

Post

jon-mullen wrote:.. if anyone was wondering if the new teams are catching up, it appears that they certainly are.
It looks to me like they're steadily improving but struggling at some tracks more than others, maybe for lack of data or lack of downforce.

+1
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Back markers

Post

with our logic of development wars in the front ...this implies Lotus,Virgin and HRT are actually developping quicker then the top teams???
how can that be?

Pit
Pit
0
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 11:42

Re: Back markers

Post

marcush. wrote:with our logic of development wars in the front ...this implies Lotus,Virgin and HRT are actually developping quicker then the top teams???
how can that be?
It is easier to upgrade a bathtub on wheels than a fully developed vehicle. Plus, the new teams have finally come to grips with their cars. At the beginning they didn't have any data whatsoever, but now this is gradually changing, which allows them to improve the setups etc.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Back markers

Post

Pit wrote:
marcush. wrote:with our logic of development wars in the front ...this implies Lotus,Virgin and HRT are actually developping quicker then the top teams???
how can that be?
It is easier to upgrade a bathtub on wheels than a fully developed vehicle. Plus, the new teams have finally come to grips with their cars. At the beginning they didn't have any data whatsoever, but now this is gradually changing, which allows them to improve the setups etc.
what a coincidence ...the new teams learning the ropes exactly with the same speed as the established teams develop their almost perfect cars...
where is the logic ?

Pit
Pit
0
Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 11:42

Re: Back markers

Post

@marcush
The new teams are at a completely different development stage than the frontrunners.
It is relatively easy to find huge gains at the very beginning, as the flaws in a given car's design are pretty obvious. However, the more perfect the car gets, the harder it is to make it even better. That pretty much explains it, at least for me ;]

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Back markers

Post

Pit wrote:@marcush
The new teams are at a completely different development stage than the frontrunners.
It is relatively easy to find huge gains at the very beginning, as the flaws in a given car's design are pretty obvious. However, the more perfect the car gets, the harder it is to make it even better. That pretty much explains it, at least for me ;]
so ,please explain just why virgin had difficulty in the last three races to get their NEW car with bigger fuel tank ,resolved fuel pickup(20l less qualy fuel) and newly developped aero up to the speed the original car had?If it where so easy for them to find speed ..I bet this would have been the golden opportunity to leapfrog
the whole new car bunch knowing the wrongs with the firsst iteration.But it just did not happen.because it is not the little appendages we see that bring the huge gains needed .also Lotus was in no ways in aposition to make huge gains ...as we see they
struggle to get closer with what they have ,as the limeit is near.
to me a lot is having the concept right .If you have flawed the basics you can tune forever it will not grow wings overnite or in day and nightshifts...
:roll: