Not really, just a fancy shed full of old european paintings and stolen artifacts... I'd rather spend my time in Timbuktu or Egypt, Machu Pichu, Mecca, or ona Carribean Islandandrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.
Irony strikes again.ISLAMATRON wrote:Not really, just a fancy shed full of old european paintings and stolen artifacts... I'd rather spend my time in Timbuktu or Egypt, Machu Pichu, Mecca, or ona Carribean Islandandrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.
There is a world outside of your eurocentric one.
Exactly why I said there might now be a reason for me to visit the UKandrew wrote:My Eurocentric one? WTF? I can think of only 2 countries in the world that I have no desire whatsoever to visit. Anyway, this shed full of old McLarens is inEurope. Welcome to the Eurocentric world!
This is F1 Technical, not Art lover. You must be the only guy on this site that doesn't wanna spend all day in that warehouse over a massive art house.andrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.
Waiting several hours in line to see the Mona Lisa(or a possibly replica of it) for 2 minutes and say hmmm... or spending that same amount of time uncoveringsome of the most beautifully designed and engineered cars ever raced... hard decision there huhspinmastermic wrote:This is F1 Technical, not Art lover. You must be the only guy on this site that doesn't wanna spend all day in that warehouse over a massive art house.andrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.
I feel so sorry for them cars, hidden away in some crappy shed. I Wish they had them on a display for all of us to go and see! I wonder how many cars Ron Dennis has in his home.spinmastermic wrote:I've been twice. If you have no interest in art it aint worth it. Paris is awesome though.
It would take me hours to get the courage to step into the MP4/4. I'd just look at it in complete awe.
I'll take them any dayjason.parker.86 wrote:I feel so sorry for them cars, hidden away in some crappy shed. I Wish they had them on a display for all of us to go and see! I wonder how many cars Ron Dennis has in his home.spinmastermic wrote:I've been twice. If you have no interest in art it aint worth it. Paris is awesome though.
It would take me hours to get the courage to step into the MP4/4. I'd just look at it in complete awe.
Depends on the lighting, it can still look plenty shiny:jason.parker.86 wrote:Another thing I noticed, the McLaren "reflective paint" seems to be less reflective and more dull compared to when they first released it? Was their a reason for that or is it just my eyes?
What can I say? I'm not a McLaren fan and would rather go somewhere that I might learn something rather than look at a bunch of cars that I have spent the past 20 odd years watch go round a track every other weekend.spinmastermic wrote:This is F1 Technical, not Art lover. You must be the only guy on this site that doesn't wanna spend all day in that warehouse over a massive art house.andrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.
