Ahh well, each to their own.andrew wrote:What can I say? I'm not a McLaren fan and would rather go somewhere that I might learn something rather than look at a bunch of cars that I have spent the past 20 odd years watch go round a track every other weekend.spinmastermic wrote:This is F1 Technical, not Art lover. You must be the only guy on this site that doesn't wanna spend all day in that warehouse over a massive art house.andrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.
Why will the BGP001 be of any interest to McLaren? 2011 regs are that different to 2009 it would be pointless; and more to the point I dont think Jenson would have the car to give them for a year or so!JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:I think the BGP001 will be hooked up to a Mclaren aero tunnel and dyno quicker than you can get rid of Ferrari Blueprints.....
So they can copy the amazing MercJohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:I think the BGP001 will be hooked up to a Mclaren aero tunnel and dyno quicker than you can get rid of Ferrari Blueprints.....
There is somthing they can learn from it.spinmastermic wrote:So they can copy the amazing MercJohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:I think the BGP001 will be hooked up to a Mclaren aero tunnel and dyno quicker than you can get rid of Ferrari Blueprints.....![]()
jason.parker.86 wrote:Maybe they are scared that they will find the engine is actually a Mercedes V10
Having visited the Louvre, I personally think that it is over rated ... Sure, a lot of the works are technically brilliant, but the vast majority of pieces left me bereft of any real connection with the subject matter or any message that the artist was trying to portray (though Napoleon's quarters were rather splendid).andrew wrote:No, just that the Louvre would be more intelectually rewarding than some shed full of old McLarens. Can't really understand someone who wouldn't want to visit somewhere like that.