Pup wrote:Yes, please stick to well known facts, like 'flailing' tires and their undocumented damage.


Pup wrote:Yes, please stick to well known facts, like 'flailing' tires and their undocumented damage.
Damn, now anything I say can't reach the degree of funny your post had :pPup wrote:Yes, please stick to well known facts, like 'flailing' tires and their undocumented damage.
I just read that. It is pretty damning that when asked
Kubica certainly was entitled to defend his position, but he forced Alonso onto the green. What did you expect Alonso to do?? Stick to his position on track and have a violent crash?? After all, they were side to side.andrew wrote:Kubica was defending his position which he is entitled to do. Alonso gained a position by going off the track. Pretty clear cut stuff - penalty was fair.
Is there a rule that says if you get forced off track and compete the pass the pass is OK?strad wrote:Ya know..the whole thing is BS..When it happened I said "oh..he'll have to give that spot back"..then when I saw in the replay that he was forced off track if figured he was good to go.
ecapox wrote:On the contrary, i thought he should have given the spot back. But they went to Charlie, he said "dont know", then he said "They'll talk about it after the race", then the stewards said "drive through penalty".
Seems contradictory that Charlie said "the stewards will hear the drivers at the end of the race, but I understand your position." and then he goes on to give him a drive through.
Charlie Whiting wrote:On the radio, I suggested to them that if they exchange position again, there would be no need for the stewards to intervene. We told Ferrari three times that in my opinion they should give the position back to Kubica.
"And we told them that immediately, right after the overtaking manoeuvre. But they didn't do that and on the third communication they said that Kubica was by then too far back to let him regain the position.