Immediately after the race Hamilton said he thought he'd left enough but didn't blame Webber. As for "allowing blame to be heaped on Webber" - talk about hyperbole; who is "heaping blame" on Webber other than a few people in here? Even the, apparently biased, British media haven't exactly been vociferous which is, admittedly, unusual.gilgen wrote:I wonder why it took Hamilton 10 days to admit his mistake. He allowed Whitmarsh to issue incorrect statements, and also allowed blame to be heaped on Webber. But, I suppose it's better late than never.Just_a_fan wrote:This is one of the reasons why I like Hamilton and also why I don't understand the accusations of arrogance. He's one of the few drivers who holds his hands up to his errors - hardly a display of arrogance at all.
It's a shame some other drivers aren't as honest...
Whitmarsh said that he thought Hamilton was unlucky to be clipped from behind and put out of the race - which he was. Considering the crap thrown at Webber by his own team after Turkey (where he absolutely wasn't at fault), I think McLaren were very level in their mutterings about the Singapore incident. I can only imagine the hysterics we'd have had from Ferrari or even Red Bull themselves had it been a role reversal.
I think Hamilton's latest statement is an attempt to draw a line under the incident. It should prevent the media from attempting to stoke up some mythical rivalry between himself and Webber. If so, very smart and a help to both drivers in the coming races.
As for "better late than never" - how long did it take Vettel to admit his mistake in Turkey? Or Webber in Valencia (i.e. admit his mistake in underestimating the backmarker)? Did Schuie ever admit his "error of judgement" in Monaco 2006?
And how long was it before Schuie admitted he was a little "firm" with Rubens? A couple of weeks IIRC and only then because of so much public disgust at the move.