Tracking of engine use - 2010

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
x-ondrasek
x-ondrasek
0
Joined: 01 Jun 2009, 23:16

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

ESPImperium wrote:If Ferarri decided to switch them they could, the precedent is at HRT with Yamamotto this year, he took Brunos blocks at Silverstone, then went to take over Karuns at Hockenheim.
Yeah, I forgot about that. It wasn't a direct swapping of two current drivers though. I'm not saying it definitely can't be done, but it would be pretty strange.

tifoly013usa
tifoly013usa
0
Joined: 13 Sep 2008, 01:06

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

any recent info on where everyone is with their engines?

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

James Allan wrote:Alonso’s concern has to be reliability, particularly of the engine he must use for the final two races. It is the unit he raced in Monza, so it’s done a bit of work already. The one in the car today had done Spa and Suzuka, so it was its last race. Brazil is a tough circuit on engines.
Alonso could find himself suddenly in exactly the same mishap that happened to Vettel. If Ferrari have had a choice they would not put three races on the unit they used in Monza. There is a real possibility that the engine could fail in Brazil or Abu Dhabi. A failure in Brazil - although unlikely - would be a double whammy because it would also mean a ten place grid penalty in Abu Dhabi.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Mysticf1
Mysticf1
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 17:20

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

What is Vettel's situation with engines now? Already being on no8 what kind of mileage are on his remaining engines?

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

The engine that failed in Korea was on its third race. So it had no planned use beyond potential use in FP1/2. I reckon that Seb has several engines which have several race distances left.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

Several engines with several races left in them? Dang, he should have used one of those in Korea!

Actually, I believe his engine was on it's second race. He'll have to go to his Spa and Monza engines for the next two.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

I can't help but think of why the engine couldn't have blown in Spa (he had no points anyways) and not in Korea :cry:

But all this bad luck is only adding to his karma piggy bank and he should be in for massive amounts of good luck in 2011 :mrgreen:
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

This is F1TECHNICAL.NET. Karma doesn't matter. Luck doesn't matter.
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

lolzi
lolzi
0
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 14:08

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

raymondu999 wrote:I can't help but think of why the engine couldn't have blown in Spa (he had no points anyways) and not in Korea :cry:

But all this bad luck is only adding to his karma piggy bank and he should be in for massive amounts of good luck in 2011 :mrgreen:
Would be nice if it worked that way, wouldn't it? :D

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:Check the facts!
As the guy living in the biggest glass house in town, you should cut it with the exclamation points.

btw, I did.

It isn't in Renault's best interest to say the engine was only on its second race, and if Horner has proved anything this season, it's that he can't open his mouth without a big juicy lie flopping out.

Besides, I'm more interested in these several engines with several races in them you know so much about. Expound upon them, please. We're all ears. :roll:

User avatar
747heavy
24
Joined: 06 Jul 2010, 21:45

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

if the stats, to which Pup´s link lead, are correct, what´s the situation with Ferrari´s No.1 engines?
Could the be upgraded to the new spec, for reliability reasons, and still be used in the races?
Or have they been used up in FP1/2 during the season allready?
If these engines are still in the pool, and upgraded to current spec, Ferrari may does not look too bad after all.
"Make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong ......
look what they can do to a carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver."
- Colin Chapman

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” - Leonardo da Vinci

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

747heavy wrote:if the stats, to which Pup´s link lead, are correct, what´s the situation with Ferrari´s No.1 engines?
Could the be upgraded to the new spec, for reliability reasons, and still be used in the races?
Or have they been used up in FP1/2 during the season allready?
If these engines are still in the pool, and upgraded to current spec, Ferrari may does not look too bad after all.
Those engines were seemingly cleaned totally inside and used as the Friday engines at all the European based races. They havnt been upgraded as that would render them a new block as per the rules. From Engine 4 in their cycle, was when they introduced their new upgraded blocks.

If they used the #1 block on Friday running, it would already be arround 1500KM in Friday running alone, and would be arround 1650km in total, and that would suggest to me that engine would be gone if you take 2000km as the roof for engine milage.

With those figures, it would make it that #1 has been used on Fridays, and with #3 being blown, and #2 being used at BAH (race) AUS, MAL FP & CHI would mean that block was used, and with #4 being used at ESP, MON & TUR would mean that #5 would be the only one with some milage in it. BUT... #4 and #5 have been used in FP at a couple races as well, means they could have maxed out their milage, if they have been used from SIN and onwards.

Alonso is thin on milage, its do-able, looking at Vettel, Webber and Kubica last year, but it is one of those things for Alonso; if one engine decides to blow, or even cough, its curtains.

According to my data [selected drivers as well for comparison]:

(Driver - Chassis - Engine - Total KM - Engines - Engine Average)
Fernando Alonso - F10 - Ferarri 056 - 12,718.591 - 8 - 1,589.824
Sebastian Vettel - RB6 - Renault RS27-2010 - 12,247.850 - 8 - 1,530.981
Mark Webber - RB6 - Renault RS27-2010 - 11,860.055 - 8 - 1,482.507
Jenson Button - MP4/25A - Mercedes FO108X - 11,885.059 - 8 - 1,485.632
Lewis Hamilton - MP4/25A - Mercedes FO108X - 11,014.723 - 8 - 1,376.840
Felipe Massa - F10 - Ferarri 056 - 12,437.957 - 9 - 1,381.995
Robert Kubica - R30 - Renault RS27-2010 - 12,280.985 - 7 - 1,754.426
Jaime Alguersuari - STR5 - Ferarri 056 - 13,064.133 - 8 - 1,633.017
Rubens Barrichello - FW32 - Cosworth CA2010 - 12,004.353 - 7 - 1,714.908
Michael Schumacher - W01 - Mercedes FO108X - 11,982.275 - 8 - 1,497.784

User avatar
747heavy
24
Joined: 06 Jul 2010, 21:45

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

Cheers ESP - appriciated !!!!
"Make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong ......
look what they can do to a carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver."
- Colin Chapman

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” - Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

engine situation Vettel AFAIK

#1: 1150 km
#2: 1090 km
#3: 1350 km
#4: 1360 km
#5: 1430 km
#6: 1440 km
#7: 1400 km
#8: 1600 km kaputt

I do not believe that Red Bull will run the higher number engines. The logical thing to do would be running engines #1 and #2 as they have the lowest milage.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Tracking of engine use - 2010

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:engine situation Vettel AFAIK

#1: 1150 km
#2: 1090 km
#3: 1350 km
#4: 1360 km
#5: 1430 km
#6: 1440 km
#7: 1400 km
#8: 1600 km kaputt

I do not believe that Red Bull will run the higher number engines. The logical thing to do would be running engines #1 and #2 as they have the lowest milage.
Id say you are on the money there, id recon #3 for FP Brazil and #2 for the race there and #4 for FP Abu Dhabi with #1 being used for the race there. By race i mean full Saturday and Sunday running.