Intego wrote:Aaaaand FIGHT!

Intego wrote:Aaaaand FIGHT!
xpensive wrote:Good lord JET, if you and marcush were working in my office, which might happen wadda you know, I would teach you both a thing or two about editing your memos and postings before releasing them.
- Firstly, Daimler is a worlwide conglomerate, rather like where I'm at now, why I'm certain that RB and small fry gets entangled in the same corporate trash as everyone else. Like you cannot procede without doing safety the Daimler way.
- Secondly, in the context of above, everything needs an xplanation, without xception, not winning while carrying the three-pointed star being one of them I can imagine.
- Thirdly, a diploma carries you a long way, still in the same context, you can be xcused being without one, but only if you win and bring back the cash to prove it.
But you will never be a member of the club.
Brawn's simulators are crap compared to the stuff at McLaren.Giblet wrote:Mercedes looked a little more competent in the last few races as the car was more on the pace.
But Honda always had trouble 'getting to grips' with tires. When they had grip sorted, they couldn't find braking stability. Even the Brawn could only get the tires to work when temperatures were right on track.
I worry for their ability to find grip in the new tires and figure them out, and for this reason, I see trouble in a least the 1st third of 2011. I'd like to see them prove me wrong however.
...marcush. wrote:[club.
With the wealth of information that Bridgestone offered, and consultation on their tires, I still find it amazing that they could never get the tires to work.WhiteBlue wrote:Brawn's simulators are crap compared to the stuff at McLaren.Giblet wrote:Mercedes looked a little more competent in the last few races as the car was more on the pace.
But Honda always had trouble 'getting to grips' with tires. When they had grip sorted, they couldn't find braking stability. Even the Brawn could only get the tires to work when temperatures were right on track.
I worry for their ability to find grip in the new tires and figure them out, and for this reason, I see trouble in a least the 1st third of 2011. I'd like to see them prove me wrong however.
Because he has an obvious vested interest in the situation and in not giving us accurate reasons as to what's really gone on. As such, we have to look at and debate little things like results over a period of time and the team's actual financial figures from last year and ask ourselves whether it all adds up. Terrible, I know.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Seems you cannot believe a word Brawn says, and you give not ONE valid reason why.
You and me in Saarland marcush, far away from those bavarians, wouldn't that be somerthing else?[/quote]xpensive wrote:...marcush. wrote:[club.
fair enough ...I´m aware of that .
I flatly deny that all those carrying diploma and titles are any better in editing memos and postings or mails ...but hey we are only humans..
As for the need for explanations I wrote this months ago ....Brawn and his guys are surely dedidcating a lot of time to firefighting and preparing presentations forecasts and meetings to explain why it is worth supporting them still...