wesley123 wrote:He outperformed 'the great Kubica' multiple times and on raw pace was really close matched to Kubica. On the end of the season he simply drove without any mistakes and could keep up the pace.
Statistics Robert Kubica vs. Vitaly Petrov(only qualifying sessions with both drivers active, just to be kind to the latter driver mentioned):
Bahrain Q2 1.54.963 - 1.56. 619
Australia Q1 1.25.588 - 1.26.095
Malaysia Q2 1.46.951 - 1.48.760
China Q2 1.35.550 - 1.36.311
Spain Q2 1.21.599 - 1.22.139
Monaco Q2 1.14.549 - 1.15.576
Turkey Q3 1.27.039 - 1.27.430
Canada Q2 1.15.682 - 1.16.844
Europe Q3 1.38.137 - 1.38.523
Great Britain Q2 1.31.344 - 1.31.796
Germany Q2 1.14.835 - 1.15.307
Hungary Q3 1.21.328 - 1.21.229
Belgium -
Italy Q2 1.22.880 - 1.23.819
Singapore Q2 1.46.949 - 1.48.165
Japan Q2 1.32.042 - 1.32.422
Korea Q2 1.37.179 - 1.37.799
Brazil Q3 1.16.552 - 1.17.566
Abu Dhabi Q2 1.40.780 - 1.40.658
What would you choose:
A - Robert Kubica had two bad qualification out of nineteen(and it was still close). Vitaly Petrov never improved his pace and was never close to Robert Kubica's pace(except on thoose two occasions, otherwise >0.4s)
B - Quote
You also have to take into consideration that all Vitaly Petrov did during the free practice sessions was to practice, while Robert Kubica did all the evaluation of new development.
So that's your opinion of what is impressing? No "fanboizm", just fact.