Please quote the rule that says the driver can't touch his car after the race.andrew wrote:Joke all you like. The car was in parc ferme conditions and a driver has no business touching it once they get out and replace the steering wheel.Diesel wrote:I'm pretty sure someone would of noticed him swapping the plank for a new one, what was he going to do with the old one, tuck it down his trousers?andrew wrote:And what about him sticking his hand under the chassis and apparently tampering with the damage? That is definately dodgy!
Apologies for the poor quality photos, but this is definately dodgy. I'm with David Coulthard on this one.Bizzare that car No. 3 was not checked. I doubt it is a typo as these things will be checked and rechecked. The luck of the devil indeed.piast9 wrote: says, the car 03 wasn't checked for skidblock thickness at all...
44.1Only those officials charged with supervision may enter the post race parc ferme. No intervention of any kind is allowed there unless authorised by such officials.Please quote the rule that says the driver can't touch his car after the race.
I've seen this rule broken ALOT, drivers from other teams nosing around the McLaren f-duct last year? Other members of the team putting head restraints back etc.beelsebob wrote:44.1Only those officials charged with supervision may enter the post race parc ferme. No intervention of any kind is allowed there unless authorised by such officials.Please quote the rule that says the driver can't touch his car after the race.
A broken alot? The poor thing, perhaps you'll need to feed him a lot of medicine.broken ALOT
Massa was 2.5s a lap slower at the time. So it wasn't really a good example of the DRS working like it's supposed to.PrancingBull wrote:Ha! I thought it was hilarious when Horner said that Newey "wouldn't let" them KERS on the car because it would compromise aero! Newey's incredible.
Also, it was interesting how initially Button was struggling making use of the DRS on Massa, but he seemed to get much better at it further along in the GP. Although, was it down to that, or were the tyre degredation/differences in car performance a bigger reason for him to be able to pass?
can he mow my lawn to?zgred wrote:![]()
It broke before this happened.zgred wrote:
Webber is always touching up on the cars in parc ferme. No big deal.volarchico wrote:Why so much hate? He managed to get 2nd with a broken car. Not bad, considering! And him touching the tray afterwards wouldn't alter anything appreciably. He didn't remove a part or change anything. Wouldn't you be curious if you just drove your heart out for 1.5 hrs, and want to see if all your work would count for anything?
True. Otherthan some reports floating around that Red Bull carried as much as 20km/h more speed on the apexes (apices?) of turn 11/12 in Melbournebeelsebob wrote:Except that we've not really seen the relative aero performance of the '11 cars at all, your assertion is based entirely on the '10 bull being dominant on aero tracks. While I'm sure the bulls will still be good on the fast corners, I would be extremely surprised if the McLaren were much behind (if at all) this season, once their new design is bedded in.
Has anyone actually got some substantiation of those rumours. I've only seen it mentioned on this forum.raymondu999 wrote:True. Otherthan some reports floating around that Red Bull carried as much as 20km/h more speed on the apexes (apices?) of turn 11/12 in Melbournebeelsebob wrote:Except that we've not really seen the relative aero performance of the '11 cars at all, your assertion is based entirely on the '10 bull being dominant on aero tracks. While I'm sure the bulls will still be good on the fast corners, I would be extremely surprised if the McLaren were much behind (if at all) this season, once their new design is bedded in.