raymondu999 wrote:With the risk of running very off-tangent, I think Red Bull has diverted more resources to the RB8 than the other teams have; with over 2 1-2s of a lead in the WCC and just about 3 and a half race lead in the WDC they can afford to, frankly. Sure Pat's good, but I'm not sure; has he had a good track record of being "aggressive" and "creative?" The last design that needed creativity was the 2009 cars; and don't forget Pat designed the MP4-24.
Even if RBR focused very little on the RB8,it would matter very little. Because apart from the change to the exhaust positions, the rules for next year remain the same. This means that this year's development applies very much next year. So if anything Ferrari have their work cut out as they have to start from a fairly clean sheet of paper.HampusA wrote:raymondu999 wrote:With the risk of running very off-tangent, I think Red Bull has diverted more resources to the RB8 than the other teams have; with over 2 1-2s of a lead in the WCC and just about 3 and a half race lead in the WDC they can afford to, frankly. Sure Pat's good, but I'm not sure; has he had a good track record of being "aggressive" and "creative?" The last design that needed creativity was the 2009 cars; and don't forget Pat designed the MP4-24.
Not so sure about that
Imagine winning almost every race in the beginning of the season, Horner and Newey thought instantly they were unstoppable again.
Then Button, Hamilton and Alonso racks up 5 wins where Mclaren has won the last 2 races on tracks that we really did not think RBR would be threatened.
I´d say RBR has a nervous breakdown and they are realizing that the other teams are catching them.
If they work on RB8 alot, they could loose this years title.
If they continue work on RB7 they might not have a good car next year.
Mclaren and Ferrari sits in a fairly good position afterall, it´s like a win/win situation due to the massive points difference.
Maybe, but Newey has probably rung every last tenth from this concept. Next year will be a 3 way fight from the beginning. I also think Mclaren will start 2012 with tha car most similar to their 2011 design(which is obviously coming good). I think next yers Ferrari will look very tight and small compared thoe the F150, while the RB8 will need something new.raymondu999 wrote:Yep. Sorry Hampus but I agree with Hemsy. It doesn't matter that they've only won 1 of the last 5 races, it matters more for Horner/Newey that Vettel has still gotten the most points from those 5 races. Sure the stat sounds worrying, "you've won 1 in the last 5 races," meaning they've been beat 4 times in the last 5, but doesn't sound as bad as any other driver's. "You've been beat 9 times in the last 11 races.
Considering his 4 rivals are taking points out of each other, very aggressively, and doing a very good job of depriving each other of points, then Red Bull will be pretty safe. Even if they don't win another race.
That would be great for F1 if it happens, but there's no shortage of examples of a teams not being up to expectations. We'd wait and see.raymondu999 wrote:I agree that next year will be a lot closer. We could see a return to 2007/2008-type McLaren/Ferrari equality, except with 3 teams.
Not entirely relevant here... but I would expect McLaren will need a redesign too... Their current design is all about feeding the beam wing, which will ceases to exist next year.donskar wrote:If I read the previous several posts correctly, it seems some of you think that RBR will be at a disadvantage because Newey will have to design a "new" car (based on the assumption that the current car has reached its peak). It also appears Ferrari will have a "new" car. I have no idea where McLaren is in the development life cycle, but I have no doubt that Newey can design a new car from a clean sheet of paper with the best of them. I trust Newey has developed new ideas as he has developed his current car and that those ideas will lead to an excellent new design. Ferrari has its work cut out for it.