Nope , not a low fuel run
Schumacher went off while on hards and now the Mercedes is being craned out of the gravel bed and placed onto the low loader.
wow merc are about 3 seconds slower than FI and williamskris wrote:Soft tyres, low fuel run, and the best he did was 1m25.520s.. That doesn't sound right.SchumiSutil wrote:It may well be, because he's back out.
I didn't quote him directly, so those are my words, not his. His exact quote was:f1316 wrote:He also kept using the phrase "there's no doubt about it". Well, whilst I obviously bow to the superior expertise of a former F1 driver, it seems to me that there's plenty of doubt about all of this.blokkie wrote:"looking tasty" and "sound-great" does not say a lotHangaku wrote:Yesterday, Martin Brundle posted on Twitter that both the Red Bulls and McLarens look very tasty, and that the cars sound great thanks to exhaust position and limited overrun.
At least not from a technical point of view
I do get the impression that the Sky coverage, even more than the BBC's, wants a headline for F1 before anything definitive has happened, which may lead him to make this sweeping statements.
Take from it what you will. I follow him on Twitter and read his posts daily, I've also followed him in motorsport for years as a driver, journalist and a commentator. I believe in what he says, as invariably he is correct.The F1 cars sound glorious this year with top exit exhausts and limited off throttle 'blowing'. Red Bull and Mcl looking good on track
Agreed but I was just saying to have some quick lap times in successions in range of 1:24 or 1:25 and not posting the fastest lap time of the test so farsnoop1050 wrote:lol why do merc need to show they are quick? its testing not a speed run
Sweet !kooleracer wrote:@MercedesAMGF1
Michael's back in the car and about to head out for the last 30mins of the session... no damage to the car after his trip over the gravel.