They seem certain that everybody trusts there will be a race, in this preliminary situation, i.e there is no track yet, you'd might xpect a tad more flexibility, no? But the chances of the track being ready for inspection in August are slim or less if you ask me.bhallg2k wrote:Only that there appears to be no end on the horizon to short-sighted greed. Then again, I guess that's why it's short-sighted.xpensive wrote:Or am I missing something here?
It's almost like they're seeing how few people they can get to attend.xpensive wrote:They seem certain that everybody trusts there will be a race, in this preliminary situation, i.e there is no track yet, you'd might xpect a tad more flexibility, no? But the chances of the track being ready for inspection in August are slim or less if you ask me.bhallg2k wrote:Only that there appears to be no end on the horizon to short-sighted greed. Then again, I guess that's why it's short-sighted.xpensive wrote:Or am I missing something here?
xpensive wrote:..the chances of the track being ready for inspection in August are slim or less if you ask me.
WB..I agree...I don't remember any of these type of criticisms of the Indian GP that was plagued with construction problems and wonder if it was going to be ready,,Or that it had a huge offering of "Grass Seating".Come on, man. I'm getting sick from hearing this again and again!
<snip>WhiteBlue wrote: ...
<snip>
There is all the evidence <snip> that the track will be ready long before the inspection.
...
...is a passable idea, much less a good one, or even allows such a nasty rumor to persist for longer than ten minutes, is either smoking some of the very finest hashish ever produced or is simply brazenly incompetent. Neither can be trusted to accomplish anything.hairy_scotsman wrote:2) GA tickets will likely be grass seating only.
Source: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012030 ... z1o9VSAhARHellmund, the suit states, offered 75 percent of the venture to McCombs and Epstein for financial backing. But by “withholding the promised funding,” the suit claims, “Hellmund's partners executed an improper and unlawful takeover of the very project he conceived, and may well have it careening toward a wall.”
After F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone, a longtime personal friend of Hellmund's, canceled the contract Hellmund negotiated because the required fees of $23 million had not been paid, the other partners, led by Epstein, negotiated a last-minute contract with Ecclestone that kept the race alive.
Hellmund, whose title was chairman of the USGP, now claims to hold 20.58 percent of the organization--the rest of his 25 percent was surrendered when “Epstein/McCombs refused to pay the circuit's architect,” the suit says--was to be paid an annual salary of $500,000 to head the project, but he says in the suit he has not been paid since September 2011.
Hellmund's suit asks for, among other things, an open inspection of the COTA books, as well as damages, though no figure was submitted.
WhiteBlue wrote:Thanks to HS! At last we see some information emerging on the struggle over the COTA contract:
Source: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012030 ... z1o9VSAhARHellmund, the suit states, offered 75 percent of the venture to McCombs and Epstein for financial backing. But by “withholding the promised funding,” the suit claims, “Hellmund's partners executed an improper and unlawful takeover of the very project he conceived, and may well have it careening toward a wall.”
After F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone, a longtime personal friend of Hellmund's, canceled the contract Hellmund negotiated because the required fees of $23 million had not been paid, the other partners, led by Epstein, negotiated a last-minute contract with Ecclestone that kept the race alive.
Hellmund, whose title was chairman of the USGP, now claims to hold 20.58 percent of the organization--the rest of his 25 percent was surrendered when “Epstein/McCombs refused to pay the circuit's architect,” the suit says--was to be paid an annual salary of $500,000 to head the project, but he says in the suit he has not been paid since September 2011.
Hellmund's suit asks for, among other things, an open inspection of the COTA books, as well as damages, though no figure was submitted.
Improper and unlawful take over by withholding promised funding. That is a very serious claim. It pretty much describes what I have thought has happened there last year. It will be interesting what the law will say about the claims and what additional information will emerge through the law suit.
No, that does not feel great at all. The story is very sad and I would have preferred had it not happened at all. But it did and I'm sure there are a lot of fans who want to know what really went down.bhallg2k wrote:That must feel great, huh?