Ah, that's why it doesn't always sound like himraymondu999 wrote:it rotates. It's not always him.Ral wrote:Yeah, not to mention that (as I found out only last Sunday, I had been breaking my head trying think where I'd heard that voice before) you know that bodyless voice asking the questions in the post-race press conference? That's him.

Yeah, the point was more that if he tones it down to that level, it's much more suited to tv commentary rather than radio.It's more like a talkshow in free practice. I think it's because of the irrelevance of the results and events. Relatively.as he does do during FP btw, then it'll be fine.
He might have been able to and good on him because that is an important part of that particular job, but Humphrey seemed no more a casual fan to me than Lazenby. Everyone can come up with stories about how their dad used to take them to the track. Who is going to know any better?I still miss Jake. He had this weird ability to seemingly juxtapose everything. If they were talking tyres and wanted to move to the physical challenge of driving in F1, he'd have a thread connecting the two. Always. I don't know how he does it. Lazenby to me feels sloghtly "cold" and "metallic." Like he's there to do a job. Jake seems to me like a relaxed, passionate fan.Lazenby as well seemed much more relaxed already for the second race..
Also, I don't really care for the "ol' boys havin' a laugh" vibe that they were more and more going towards and the ever more ridiculous situations that inevitably pushed Eddie Jordan in. I wasn't ever a fan of his, but they didn't help his cause. And his shirts might have been colourful, but they had squat to do with F1. As long as everyone on the team seems happy to do the job they are there to do, that's all the casual I'm looking for and I will maintain that Lazenby does that job just as well as Humphrey.