like they made the f-duct legal? attach it to some other system.. i.e brake bias adjuster?zyphro wrote:They had been developing this, when Renault was developing the RRH too (Bob Bell was fresh out of Renault).
But how are they going to make it legal?
what is to be won validating a scenario in cfd and on track you are not going to race?shelly wrote:I think they test in cfd and wt also a car configuration with the a model of the measuring equipment fitted. So no issues about perturbations: they are modelled too.
Plz don't feed the trollszyphro wrote:And why do you say that?xpensive wrote:
I'm not so certain that MS would agree with that however?
There's nothing to suggest that he would disagree; he has widely said he's happy in the manner the team is conducting its work.
Very worrying reports these...Hail22 wrote:Didn't know whether to post this here or make a new thread however it has to do with Mercedes AMG F1 to the bone.
Just read this by F1SA:
http://www.f1sa.com/index.php?option=co ... Itemid=157
Would there be any truth in this? especially leaving it right til the end of the year in order to hold a shareholders vote?
they had monkey seat before.ForMuLaOne wrote:I would like to talk about something that really irritates me. We`ve seen a lot of upgrades for every team`s car so far. But many of them are parts they already used last year. The monkey seat is new to mercedes, but what about the endplate fins which help the diffusor? I mean they were running them on the W02 and i still don`t see them. So, maybe i am wrong, but to me it seems like many teams do not hit the ground with a car that represents their full potential. Sure, you have to talk about aero balance, they cannot bolt on downforce at the end, without doing so at the front. But why do cars lack parts their predecessors were showing?