@ SK: I gave MGP the benefit of the doubt when I worried they might be a threat to Ferrari in 2010. That worry has since turned to gratitude for MGP's new status as a buffer.
@ X: All things in context.
Perhaps Ross is hanging around to try and short Mercedes stock when it comes out that there will be heavy losses due to AMG's F1 team?xpensive wrote:You call a 60 MUSD retirement fund in Switzerland nothing, do you Ball?bhallg2k wrote: ...
Nothing. Not a damn thing.
(This is fun.)
That's rather good.
At least we have a new information...xpensive wrote:Are the Mercedes engines the most powerful on the grid, while MGP's version is the most equal of them all? I'm shocked...
I love it.xpensive wrote:Like Norb is xplaining it to DrZ;
- Ze problem is zat powerful engine of ours!
- I zought power was a good zing, yes?
- Not wiz zeese italian tyres!
- Can you tune it less powerful, yes?
- Noooo, they are all homologated!
Marcus, I think you, myself, and xpensive should get together one day so we can shoot the sh*t about MGP.marcush. wrote:it happens to be aa renault ,,err lotus as they are called now...![]()
Now it´s the engine...when tyres are surviving on other cars...I´m amazed.
little note : it looks like the flak for Norby and Ross is heating up when they report to the board-oh stop Norby is memeber of the board ,no?
/facepalm The merc engines are widely considered the most powerful on the grid. You're American... You have Steve Matchett mentioning this every race weekend, and you're sighting an article that discusses how the Merc engine's power is chewing up the tires as contradicting me?SeijaKessen wrote:Now wouldn't this fly in the face of the claim made by one poster that Merc engines are the absolute best out there?