Clutch

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Dantheman
Dantheman
0
Joined: 26 Oct 2006, 11:21
Location: UK

Clutch

Post

Hi. I've been wondering if it would be possible somehow for F1 teams to get rid of the clutch. Now most teams have seamless shift I guess it only gets used at the start so losing it would save quite a bit of weight and space. I'd just be interested to hear any thoughts and ideas of how the clutch could be "bypassed" if possible.

Thanks, Danny.

Seas
Seas
0
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 03:59
Location: Croatia

Post

Honestly, I don't believe that is possible because he is used at the start of race, pit stops and other situations when car should stop, and most important, restart with race. But, who know, this modern techno wizards can invent anything. :? :!: :idea:
http://www.formula1-dictionary.net/index.html
Croatia, the small country for big relax

P1
P1
0
Joined: 06 Dec 2006, 12:11

Post

Don't they have to use it on the downshifts, too?
"This is a farce!"

-David Hobbs reacting to the 6 car start of the 2005 US Formula One Grand Prix.

Seas
Seas
0
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 03:59
Location: Croatia

Post

Don't they have to use it on the downshifts, too?

They using it on downshifts, but I think not to completely separate motor and gearbox like on road cars, but only to aloud slipping between them. This is for sequential gearbox. On new seamless gearboxes clutch is not in use during the race because transfer of torque between gears is done by gearbox itself. Anyway, actuating clutch in case of seamless gearbox is to slow process for this type of gearbox to be useful.
http://www.formula1-dictionary.net/index.html
Croatia, the small country for big relax

Dantheman
Dantheman
0
Joined: 26 Oct 2006, 11:21
Location: UK

Post

I never thought about pit stops, I guess they would use the clutch then. The reason I ask really is because I'm sure I read somewhere that Ferrari where thinking about casting the cylinder block and gearbox as one unit and getting rid of the clutch somehow but I cant think how it could be done. Just thought one of you guys might know.

RH1300S
RH1300S
1
Joined: 06 Jun 2005, 15:29

Post

Well it seems to me that you don't need a clutch as such. You need to be able to do two things:

1. Change from one gear to another - for which a clutch is not necessary at all (even with a manual hand-change gearbox you can drive without a clutch).

2. You need to be able to disengage the drive somehwere between the crank and the driven wheels.

Surely you could do this in the diff if you really wanted to (or even at the hubs ;)).

Seas
Seas
0
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 03:59
Location: Croatia

Post

Dantheman wrote:I never thought about pit stops, I guess they would use the clutch then. The reason I ask really is because I'm sure I read somewhere that Ferrari where thinking about casting the cylinder block and gearbox as one unit and getting rid of the clutch somehow but I cant think how it could be done. Just thought one of you guys might know.
I think you are right about this Ferrari project. I can't remember where I read about this, but in this project, if I remember well, they want to put clutch discs someplace between gearbox and wheels or something like this. In same time, McLaren have in project some special kind of flying wheel with power restoration capabilities. Of course, FIA baned all this.
http://www.formula1-dictionary.net/index.html
Croatia, the small country for big relax

Dantheman
Dantheman
0
Joined: 26 Oct 2006, 11:21
Location: UK

Post

It sounds like it could be done somehow but would be stamped out by the FIA. But it would still be interesting to find out how it could be done. I think its agreeable that the clutch serves very little purpose in a race car these days.

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Post

Very interesting topic :)

If you removed the clutch and locked the gearbox shaft to the crank then you'd still have to introduce some 'give' somewhere to absorb the shock of the power delivery.
My first thought would be to use the tyres but we can't compromise the tyre grip just for the sake of removing the clutch.

However then I thought seeing as the clutch is only used in first gear (to my knowledge), could the first gear synchro be abolished and replaced with some kind of clutch mechanism? It might need to be a 'wet' clutch.
What do you think?

User avatar
ackzsel
0
Joined: 15 Nov 2005, 15:40
Location: Alkmaar, NED

Post

zac510 wrote: However then I thought seeing as the clutch is only used in first gear (to my knowledge), could the first gear synchro be abolished and replaced with some kind of clutch mechanism? It might need to be a 'wet' clutch.
What do you think?
That sounds like a very interesting idea, but do F1 gearboxes still have synchro's?

riff_raff
riff_raff
132
Joined: 24 Dec 2004, 10:18

Post

F1 gearboxes don't use synchro rings, they use dog rings. Recently they have been trying something like this:

http://www.zeroshift.com/applications/index.htm

Carlos
Carlos
11
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 19:43
Location: Canada

Post

Here is a patent abstact for a transmission using dog clutch feature.
Both of these sites are about dual shaft, dual clutch set ups that use the dog clutches for moving things around. The second contrasts this type of transmission to the CVT
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6427549.html
http://gadgets.autoblog.com/2005/07/01/ ... -heats-up/

Welcome back riff_raff - & thanks for dusting off some old threads

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

Well, it has been said here that you could replace clutch, gearbox AND differential with a new invention called an hydristor. Besides, you get CVT (continuous variable transmission) AND storage of energy.

Yes, I know, it sounds too good to be true. I will be thankful if you can bypass the dense prose by Tom Kasmer, the inventor himself, Checkered and myself and give us some comment: viewtopic.php?t=3577
Ciro