Loooolll
She is bullsh*** all the way, come on, nobody believes that at all. As you said REALLY dropped the ball.Emerson.F wrote:Claire really dropped the ball today. That must have been humiliating for Massa. Bad call Claire, bad call.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdH1idgxNtU
ACJJ619 wrote:Vettel was quicker than Hamilton in the speed trap. What will it take to put this "Mercedes are only winning cause of the engine" myth to bed?
Source: http://184.106.145.74/f1-championship/f ... ap_V01.pdf
Probably the fakest interview I'v ever seen.Jef Patat wrote:She is bullsh*** all the way, come on, nobody believes that at all. As you said REALLY dropped the ball.Emerson.F wrote:Claire really dropped the ball today. That must have been humiliating for Massa. Bad call Claire, bad call.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdH1idgxNtU
If Hamilton never used DRS (maybe from lapping, not sure) and if Vettel did, that might be the reason of the speed trap readings.ACJJ619 wrote:Vettel was quicker than Hamilton in the speed trap. What will it take to put this "Mercedes are only winning cause of the engine" myth to bed?
Source: http://184.106.145.74/f1-championship/f ... ap_V01.pdf
It might have something to do with engine life.ChrisM40 wrote:Whats interesting for me is that if the fuel usage graphics are true then the teams had a margin, some over 10%, so why weren't they pushing harder?
I understand Lewis not doing so, since he didnt need to, but if you finish the race with 8 to 10% fuel left, you haven't managed it properly..
Which makes me suspious those % readings are not as exact as they'd like us to believe.ChrisM40 wrote:Whats interesting for me is that if the fuel usage graphics are true then the teams had a margin, some over 10%, so why weren't they pushing harder?
I understand Lewis not doing so, since he didnt need to, but if you finish the race with 8 to 10% fuel left, you haven't managed it properly..
It won't put it to bed whatsoever. Look bro, if you took the time and effort to install f1 live timing app and keep an eye on S1 and S3 speed trap data, you would know that those numbers for top speed are meaningless. All merc PU equipped cars were 15 kmh+ on average faster than all renault PU cars, lap after lap after lap..ACJJ619 wrote:Vettel was quicker than Hamilton in the speed trap. What will it take to put this "Mercedes are only winning cause of the engine" myth to bed?
Source: http://184.106.145.74/f1-championship/f ... ap_V01.pdf
They had 10% *of the limit* spare. That doesn't mean they had 10% of their fuel spare. They may well have run with only 92kg in the first place.ChrisM40 wrote:Whats interesting for me is that if the fuel usage graphics are true then the teams had a margin, some over 10%, so why weren't they pushing harder?
I understand Lewis not doing so, since he didnt need to, but if you finish the race with 8 to 10% fuel left, you haven't managed it properly..
One has to wonder if the ability to run harder more often is worth more than running slightly lighter and having to lift and coast more. Im sure they run the maths, but we all know the maths doesn't always match real world situations.beelsebob wrote:They had 10% *of the limit* spare. That doesn't mean they had 10% of their fuel spare. They may well have run with only 92kg in the first place.ChrisM40 wrote:Whats interesting for me is that if the fuel usage graphics are true then the teams had a margin, some over 10%, so why weren't they pushing harder?
I understand Lewis not doing so, since he didnt need to, but if you finish the race with 8 to 10% fuel left, you haven't managed it properly..