Kiril Varbanov wrote:Skid blocks allowing lower ride height would completely scrap the previously tightened rules for plank wear and manufacturer tolerance. So, it's just a spark show, which adds more frustration to the already artificial show.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BqgtzHhCAAA420I.png:large
Oh not again with "artificial" everything including overtaking. Even with DRS they can't still overtake. Sometimes it's too easy (every driver can overtake), sometimes it's impossible (ask Hamilton behind Hulkenberg 2013 somewhere), sometimes it helps with race win battles (Maldonado+Alonso Barcelona 2012 vs Raikkonen), usually it still takes a lot of skills to overtake and is still skills differentiator between drivers.
F1 is from top to bottom artificial joke starting with couple of big teams owning and setting technical and other rules by themselves and getting bulk of prize and other money for nothing. BTW When was this "pure" F1? With launch control, traction control (the horror - the car was doing everything not the driver, how artificial, all Schumacher wins were bleh), ride-height adjustments, silly grooved tyres that needed to be abused to work and fuel differences in qualifying - no one knew exactly who was faster except for some flawed fuel corrected nonsense. If you want the best example of artificial - look no further but 2014 engine rules - the whole championship and every race was decided before it began in favour of three team and in reality one.
I'm too lazy to find thread/posts about it so I'll throw it here. AMus claims Ros-Ham did something different around pitstops in Canada: braking technique and short-lived change of brake bias. I always thought Wolff tried little too hard to convince everyone it was exactly the same plus luck.
http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... 16536.html BTW if anyone loves "old-school" Austria track - they should put them on egg shape ones or ovals - classic factor bigger 100 times. India was also a nice, fast track.