Nathanael F1 wrote:So Vettel defends hard against Ricciardo and is given a super harsh 10 second penalty. I hate the steward penalty decision system - it's like they just do whatever they feel like that day. We've seen so many incidents where Verstappen ran other drivers off the road and erratically moved under braking and didn't get penalized. Vettel didn't do either to nearly the same extent.
It is
because Verstappen has made this type of move in the braking zones so many times that some drivers pushed for this unwritten rule to be cast in stone with guidelines for the stewards to follow, starting at the USA Grand Prix. Before the USA it was a guideline and open to interpretation and Max rightly or wrongly had the benefit of the doubt by various race stewards at multiple events.
At the USA drivers meeting several drivers tabled a motion for Charlie Whiting to impose a new rule, enforceable through telemetry, in which changing direction under braking is strictly not allowed.
So where before three stewards would umm and ahh and debate shades of grey, the drivers themselves have granted Charlie black and white rules backed up with their own telemetry
This is the Stewards' statement
The stewards paid particular attention to the Race Directors Notes from the US Grand Prix (v2) and from this event (point 18).
Notwithstanding the F1 Commission directive to "let the drivers race" we note the concern that has been expressed about manoeuvrers involving a change of direction under braking as expressed at the Drivers Briefing at the US Grand Prix and in the Race Director's Notes from the US Grand Prix and this event.
The telemetry and video evidence shows that the driver of Car 5 did change direction under braking.
Article 27.5 and the Race Director's Notes have essentially three criteria that determine a breach
1) Driving in a manner potentially dangerous
2) An abnormal change of direction
3) Another driver having to take evasive action
The video footage, including the close circuit footage, the broadcast vision, both drivers' on board cameras plus the telemetry show that there was an abnormal change of direction by Car 5 and this was considered to be potentially dangerous in view of the proximity of the wheels of each car.
The video evidence clearly shows that Car 3 had to take evasive action as a result. Accordingly as all three criteria have been met, the driver of Car 5 is guilty of a breach of Article 27.5
So it was slam dunk and Vettel was hoist with his own petard.