Woah, woah, woah, woah woah! Let's not get ahead ahead of ourselves.basti313 wrote:Where is the difference with driving a Merc paired with Rosberg? I mean...we all know that Rosberg is slow and sucks and, thus, does not deserve a championship.ChrisDanger wrote:Exactly. What a time to be driving that Red Bull paired with Webber!mclaren111 wrote:
I agree. Vettel is luckiest driver in history of F1
Firstly, I did not say Vettel was a bad driver. Pretty much the entire F1 grid with one or two exceptions are fantastic drivers. When you start comparing the top 0.1% of professional racing drivers you can't go around saying any of them "suck". I just said he was lucky. That first one was very lucky and a surprise to most, and the rest were more a function of a Newey-designed beast and a pairing with an ageing, weaker teammate. Even when he was dominant people were questioning his racecraft because he was almost always unchallenged.
Secondly, I did not say Rosberg has not lucked into this championship lead (and probable but not certain victory). There definitely has been some luck involved. It is not the first time that this has happened!
Thirdly, this talk of "deserving" to be champion is utter nonsense. If you win, you win. If it comes to you by luck, then maybe you're a bit lucky. But deserving? Now you're getting into the realm of opinion, which I don't even see the point of debating because there's no right or wrong answer. And if you open that can of worms would you be willing to judge whether all the previous drivers who won in dominant cars were "deserving" or just lucky to be in the right place at the right time. Also, there's more to being a champion than winning races, or scoring points. These people started from the bottom, worked their way to the top tier, and dedicated their lives to their passion. And you're going to make a sweeping statement like "oh he doesn't deserve to be champion because my favourite driver's engine blew up that one time"? Seriously...