2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Post Reply
marvin78
4
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 09:33

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.

Restomaniac
0
Joined: 16 May 2016, 01:09
Location: Hull

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

GPR -A wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:31
Restomaniac wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:14
The thing is that if they start bolting downforce on then how much of their straight line advantage will they lose?
First off, Bahrain and China are actually, relatively low downforce circuits! China is so much more front limited and doesn't demand a whole lot from the rear.

If NIco's statement there is believable, then one would have to start thinking if they have the right front wing philosophy. The reason why I am wondering is, the car has to be balanced on front and rear downforce, which is probably the case for NOW. Trying to simply enhance the rear downforce and not having a balanced amount of front downforce, would make the car more understeery. As it is, the Ferrari cars of the past 2 years and this one, have an inherent understeer. They already have higher AoA on their front wing, compared to Mercedes and any more, would create more drag and mess up flow downstream.

I have a feeling that, they probably have overestimated the downforce level that can be extracted from their rear wing. May be because of that, the rest of the rear of the car probably is producing less downforce than Mercedes.

The problem is, Ferrari haven't shown great deal of in-season development in the past seasons and if this in fact is something, then you don't put a lot of money on them coming out flying for the rest of the season.
Yep, it’s like they have made their car as fast as posssible in a straight line and just totally misjudged what they need to actually turn corners. That’s why I’m questioning the whole ‘Super-duper powerful engine’ argument. If Mercedes had shown the same problems in cornering then it may be more valid.

If as you say we have the same in-season developments as previous seasons then it’s already done bar the shouting.
Last edited by Restomaniac on 13 Apr 2019, 14:03, edited 2 times in total.

Restomaniac
0
Joined: 16 May 2016, 01:09
Location: Hull

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

marvin78 wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:41
I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.
To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!

User avatar
aleks_ader
90
Joined: 28 Jul 2011, 08:40

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

It seems. Funny or not. The only way to stop the Mers is just leave the regs untouched. And let the law of diminishing returns turn its ugly face again. Just like in PU department. Kudos to their tech team.
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

User avatar
GPR-A
37
Joined: 05 Oct 2018, 13:08

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Restomaniac wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:58
marvin78 wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:41
I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.
To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!
I have said this in the past and say it again. It's the depth that this team has in their ranks and the culture that the management has cultivated in the organization. They have not created a team around an individual's ideas, but have allowed individuals to bring their ideas. Brawn left, then Bob Bell left then Paddy Lowe left and now Aldo Costa has retired (albeit he is consulting mode now). Essentially, this team is not dependent upon the executive management and have the strength to conceive newer ideas for the car, go ahead and build them. Most importantly, as Toto has been mentioning, "See it, say it, fix it" culture has allowed people to express themselves well. The secure atmosphere where there is no witch hunting on failures, allows them to come back stronger, every time there is a hiccup. The heroes are most likely people whose names we don't know.

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

So Giovinazzi had the same problem as Leclerc in Bahrain. They'll now change his CE for the race as well to an older spec, Kimi will stick to the current one according to motorsport.com.

Carl Mccoy
0
Joined: 18 Mar 2019, 17:31

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

0.3s is not an eternity. The soft tires at Ferrari were already dead at the end of the lap.

User avatar
JordanMugen
82
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Restomaniac wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:58
To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!
You mean the 2017 and 2019 aero changes respectively?

While superficially major, 2017 were specifically designed as a rescaling of the existing 2016 cars AFAIK... even the relative proportions of the front and rear tyres were maintained at the same ratio.

The 2019 front wing change is quite minor, and most teams have similar overall concepts as before.

dfegan358
-2
Joined: 29 May 2018, 02:16

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Vettel team radio after qualifying “ we had it , we had it. “ then “we know why though”

Any ideas to what he is getting at? Seen somewhere else referring to poor outlap management by the pit wall.

I’m not convinced. Something could going we don’t know about it. Obviously a problem with the CE as Giovinazzi needed his replaced.

Would an older spec CE, like vettel and Leclerc had today affect PU performance?

Restomaniac
0
Joined: 16 May 2016, 01:09
Location: Hull

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

JordanMugen wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 14:49
Restomaniac wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:58
To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!
You mean the 2017 and 2019 aero changes respectively?

While superficially major, 2017 were specifically designed as a rescaling of the existing 2016 cars AFAIK... even the relative proportions of the front and rear tyres were maintained at the same ratio.

The 2019 front wing change is quite minor, and most teams have similar overall concepts as before.
Yet no team has ever managed it through similar reg changes no matter how major/minor.

Restomaniac
0
Joined: 16 May 2016, 01:09
Location: Hull

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

GPR -A wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 14:25
Restomaniac wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:58
marvin78 wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 13:41
I must say: Kudos to Mercedes. They seem to have a hell of a car again. I am really surprised that they can hold this level of developement over so many years. It's a really big thing that is going on therre. It's a pitty that they always talk themelves down. They are by far the best at the whole package and everyone should know that by know. Absolutely impressive. Dominating such a long aera is new. And there seems to be no end for that.
To put it in context, previously no team had ever gone through a major reg change and kept their title. Mercedes have done once and are looking like pulling it off again!
I have said this in the past and say it again. It's the depth that this team has in their ranks and the culture that the management has cultivated in the organization. They have not created a team around an individual's ideas, but have allowed individuals to bring their ideas. Brawn left, then Bob Bell left then Paddy Lowe left and now Aldo Costa has retired (albeit he is consulting mode now). Essentially, this team is not dependent upon the executive management and have the strength to conceive newer ideas for the car, go ahead and build them. Most importantly, as Toto has been mentioning, "See it, say it, fix it" culture has allowed people to express themselves well. The secure atmosphere where there is no witch hunting on failures, allows them to come back stronger, every time there is a hiccup. The heroes are most likely people whose names we don't know.
Agreed.

User avatar
JordanMugen
82
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Restomaniac wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 14:54
Yet no team has ever managed it through similar reg changes no matter how major/minor.
How about Ferrari maintaining their championships from 2000 to 2001, despite the raised front wing height in 2001? :wink:

Williams also were not troubled by the reduction in rear tyre width and vehicle width from 1992 to 1993.
Last edited by JordanMugen on 13 Apr 2019, 15:19, edited 1 time in total.

foxmulder_ms
1
Joined: 10 Feb 2011, 20:36

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

Ham will butcher Bottas tomorrow. Easy win. :)

foxmulder_ms
1
Joined: 10 Feb 2011, 20:36

Re: 2019 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai, April 12-14

Post

dfegan358 wrote:
13 Apr 2019, 14:50
Vettel team radio after qualifying “ we had it , we had it. “ then “we know why though”

Any ideas to what he is getting at? Seen somewhere else referring to poor outlap management by the pit wall.

I’m not convinced. Something could going we don’t know about it. Obviously a problem with the CE as Giovinazzi needed his replaced.

Would an older spec CE, like vettel and Leclerc had today affect PU performance?
Yeah, Ferrari might have a little more. Their outlab was quicker than merc I believe.

Post Reply