
Thats said minds had changed shortly after that with in Belgium and many instances after that of course.
Happy to say I have happily been proven wrong and will use this as proof that my armchair analysis is of no value to the sport!PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:36 pmAha! First one!SiLo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:56 amThis still feels like a knee-jerk reaction to Bianchi's death. The sport is dangerous, the drivers know that and I'm pretty sure they accept it every time they get in the car otherwise they would be sitting at home watching on TV like the rest of us.
9 out of 10 teams said no to it, and they pushed it through anyway? Good work FIA![]()
I'm picking out the naysayers in the thread.![]()
I hope i wasnt one of them though...![]()
I was wrong, I no longer notice the Halo. And now know that it's a needed bit of kit. On the weekend that the Aresnal v Wolves game had much criticism about a clash of heads, its great that F1 can say that we saved a life because of this piece of gear. Its not perfect, its pretty near close to it however.ESPImperium wrote: ↑Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:04 pmIve always wondered why the central section isn't taken away for two smaller less obtrusive (but still structurally strong enough) pillars don't come down and join on as part of the wing mirrors mounts?
If it was like this, i think it would get a nod form me as it would be much better looking for me, however still grotesque in the terms of the look of a F1 car.