EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
toto1041
toto1041
0
Joined: 21 Jul 2009, 16:02

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

In the spirit of F1 technical regs, they are finding the most clever way to get around the rules.

feynman
feynman
3
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 20:36

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:
imightbewrong wrote:Happy now? :)
Image
No, they should get rid of that stupid box too, and advertise for some cancer related charities

No, you get your own car and you paint it how you like. Better still, climb off your high-horse and go do some volunteer work for your cancer charities, spend less time cheap-signalling on an internet messageboard.

It's their private property, it's their free-expression, you or some net-curtain twitching illiberal doctor, should have precisely the square-root of bugger-all input on the matter of how anyone chooses to paint their own property. Dig?

Just on principle, I'd paint the whole motor, front to back, like a massive Marly snout, just specifically to noise-up those operating under the woeful misaprehension that they can tell others what to do.

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

They should have kept the barcode but thanks to some pseudo "doctor" they have had to change it. No doubt this same idiot "doctor" will say it is the same shape as a pack of smokes and the anti-Ferrari regulars will jump n that band wagon also.

User avatar
thestig84
12
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 13:09

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

Marlboro must love that Doctor!!!

Over the last week Marlboro would have only got a mention on the FIA entry list. Now instead they have had the internet chatting about Marlboro for a week and now even longer with Ferrari removing the barcode thus insuring more talk about it.

Any publicity is good publicity!

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

Its there for one reason only.

Marlboro

Forget liberalism or anti Ferrari pidgeon-holing, the fact remains its there in homage to Marlboro.

Sponsors

The Team displays this on its cars and uniforms as part of the Scuderia Ferrari F1 outfit.

Ferrari

Receive millions in recompense to display it.

Marlboro Sponsor Ferrari

Right or wrong, no one can dispute this.
More could have been done.
David Purley

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

JET, are you satisfied now that your post has mentioned the same argument for the umpteenth time? The same goes for the one about Ferrari giving the money received from Marlboro to charities.

Reading the same things over and over and over and over again from both sides is quite tiring.

Ferrari aren't doing anything illegal. Immoral yes, but who is anyone to tell them what to do? The fact that they removed the barcode is a sign of weakness though, they shouldn't have caved in like this, just for the sake of keeping the naysayers happy.

Besides, I have a feeling that Marlboro are being phased and the signing of Santander is part of it. Although they might come and go along with Alonso. I don't recall the amount of years in the contract.
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

White and red = Marlboro.

Image

So, there is still same space reserved by Marlboro, now even more obvious design as it is identical to top of Marlboro pack front turned upside down.

Image

Image

andrew
andrew
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 15:08
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland - WhiteBlue Country (not the region)

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

Oh look, a red and white Ferrari from 1972 with no Marlboro advertising. Ferrari have raced red cars from year dot.

Image
Last edited by andrew on 07 May 2010, 00:44, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

MX tifosi

Point taken. Just seems more than "immoral" to me.

Operating outside the law more like
More could have been done.
David Purley

vall
vall
0
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 21:31

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

manchild wrote:White and red = Marlboro.

Image

So, there is still same space reserved by Marlboro, now even more obvious design as it is identical to top of Marlboro pack front turned upside down.

Image

Image
Yeah, I see your point. Even if they come up with plain red car, you will say that the design is exactly as a pack Boro if you remove all the white :D

andartop
andartop
14
Joined: 08 Jun 2008, 22:01
Location: London, UK

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

:shock:

- BREAKING NEWS -

Lotus F1 Team apparently are being forced off F1 as the Malaysian government decided, after a hint by a former NHS doctor, to suspend all operations of the team declaring them illegal. The reason stated was that the colouring of the Team's F1 cars contains a subliminal advertising message for durian. Durians are prohibited for public consumption in Malaysia because they stink.

Durian image: http://liyliymyworld.files.wordpress.co ... 53_std.jpg

No durians sign from underground: http://forum.difflock.com/files/durian_177.jpg

Wiki description of durian flavour and odour: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durian#Flavour_and_odour
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

2005 to date is five years, at least I think that is the period that tobacco advertising in F1 has been against European law.
How many million Euros will that be if Ferrari are made to pay it to cancer charities to help save the lives of our children?
I think those charities should ramp up the pressure to make sure of this result. It might for once show some justice and sense in Europe.

andartop
andartop
14
Joined: 08 Jun 2008, 22:01
Location: London, UK

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

- BREAKING NEWS -

Following earlier reports, it has now been confirmed that the actual reason Lotus F1 was banned is that the colouring contains subliminal messages for hashish consumption rather than durian. What was originally mistaken to represent the yellow flesh of the fruit is actually a hint to a smiley face, widely recognised symbol of hashish users.

PS. Autogyro, could you please clarify for all forum members who happen to be experiencing phase-shifts due to hashish or durian consumption exactly what do you think the EU and charities should force Ferrari to do with the money they have been receiving from Marlboro?
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

andrew wrote:Oh look, a red and white Ferrari from 1972 with no Marlboro advertising. Ferrari have raced red cars from year dot.
So you base your opinion that there is no Marlboro advertising on the Ferrari's based on that they have been red and white in the past?

Cigarettes don' kill people, people have been dieing since year dot.

Your logic is illogical. Weak.

We all know Ferrari have red cars. That is not the issue. The issue is the advertising space on the cars, and who pays for it, and what it represents.

It's Marlboro.

I also wonder why you keep referencing "Doctors" in quotes. It makes me wonder where "Andrew" gets his "Opinions" on these "facts" that he "presents".

John Britton, a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians got his opinion from being a Doctor, not a "Doctor".
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

feynman
feynman
3
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 20:36

Re: EU slams Ferrari over Marlboro partnership

Post

Image

Image

Image