Seriously?Mestrades wrote:I'm not so optimistic. This 2 day tests have been dissapointing
It may be because the wing actuators are in the endplates. So they sacrifice some width to get a cleaner airflow to the middle of the wings.jordangp wrote:Does anyone know why Merc decided to go for a shorter width rear wing this year? This is the only car I remember seeing, where the full 20mm width is used right next to the wing planes. Usually, this area of the rear wing is as thin as possible, to maximise wing area
I'll bet you it (the endplate) has a complex 3D curvature integrated with the wing to ever-so-slightly improve the "lift" vector[1] of and/or overall lift of the rear wing[2].jordangp wrote:Does anyone know why Merc decided to go for a shorter width rear wing this year? This is the only car I remember seeing, where the full 20mm width is used right next to the wing planes. Usually, this area of the rear wing is as thin as possible, to maximise wing area
Advantage of doing this? Force India did that last year, but don't remember endplates being that thick.horse wrote:It may be because the wing actuators are in the endplates. So they sacrifice some width to get a cleaner airflow to the middle of the wings.jordangp wrote:Does anyone know why Merc decided to go for a shorter width rear wing this year? This is the only car I remember seeing, where the full 20mm width is used right next to the wing planes. Usually, this area of the rear wing is as thin as possible, to maximise wing area
Yeah you can see that curvature above the elements, as teams have for yearsnow underneath the wing elements. I also wonder why they have shaped the endplate like this? Red bull has always had a curve in the endplate under the main plane, and the beam wing, leaving the endplate thin at the top, to maximise wing area also. Mercedes seem to be doing the opposite to this.kilcoo316 wrote:I'll bet you it (the endplate) has a complex 3D curvature integrated with the wing to ever-so-slightly improve the "lift" vector[1] of and/or overall lift of the rear wing[2].jordangp wrote:Does anyone know why Merc decided to go for a shorter width rear wing this year? This is the only car I remember seeing, where the full 20mm width is used right next to the wing planes. Usually, this area of the rear wing is as thin as possible, to maximise wing area
[1] Through increased localised acceleration at the lowest section of the rear wing 1st element suction surface.
[2] Through so-so-slight reductions in the adverse pressure gradient on the suction surface of the 2nd element.
Mercedes had the same system last year too! Hang on, quick image hunt.... I mean long image hunt in the W02 thread. And here...jordangp wrote:Advantage of doing this? Force India did that last year, but don't remember endplates being that thick.
Yeah, Virgin managed to close the gap to Lotus by at least a second without bringing a single aero update just by focusing on setup last year (or maybe the year before).raymondu999 wrote:Well for what it's worth the BGP001 lineage until last year has seemed to always be very compliant to setup - if you changed setup it was reflected in the handling. That much was said in 2009; and in 2010/2011 when they stopped car development their car was basically just "developed" by furthering the team's understanding of the car's setup sweet spots.
That looks like exhaust is angled upwards a fair bitPibe wrote: Also, I would like to point out that on this photo and on the one that was posted above, you can see two pipes coming out of the engine cover where the redbull has the '' cannon '' cooling outlet.
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2396 ... 2fe120.jpg
That surely cant be exaust, are they piping the airflow from the rads to there?