like playing bluff in poker .... did that help ?Peetbeat wrote:would you explain it to me in other words =( because im so good in english !dont know what you mean with sand bagging?mahesh248f1 wrote:talking about sand bagging .Peetbeat wrote:Schumacher was fastest overall in S1:. 21.540s
i love to read that
thank you!gridwalker wrote:Sandbagging = deliberately appearing to be slower than they really are.
This is normally done to fool competitors.
The phrase is meant to imply adding sandbags to the car to make it heavier & slower (though nobody would actually do that) ...
yeah exactly , you know the term !!!Peetbeat wrote:i only know it from poker ^^ when i check-raise this is called sand bagging do mean that?
Is there some page with live timing with sector times?mahesh248f1 wrote:talking about sand bagging .Peetbeat wrote:Schumacher was fastest overall in S1:. 21.540s
i love to read that
http://live.autosport.com/commentary.php/id/441 it was writtenMr.G wrote:Is there some page with live timing with sector times?mahesh248f1 wrote:talking about sand bagging .Peetbeat wrote:Schumacher was fastest overall in S1:. 21.540s
i love to read that
Testing times are discussed in the testing threadMr.G wrote:Is there some page with live timing with sector times?
No sectors however progressive lap times: http://f1tests.co.cc/2012.phpMr.G wrote:Is there some page with live timing with sector times?mahesh248f1 wrote:talking about sand bagging .Peetbeat wrote:Schumacher was fastest overall in S1:. 21.540s
i love to read that
I would think as much. Dont think they are thinking about qualy and race stuff yet? do you?Mr.S wrote:MSC did a 1-23.3 on Softs on a 1 lap run. Hope it was a used soft or they HAD much more fuel because did a great time with Hards on a long run.