A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
[quote="ecapox"]....edited out Marko flame war comment Flyboy2160 .....However it is harder to explain Raikkonen's problems and the fact that Sauber and Marussia didn't get same boost from fuel (if they use Shell too).
Last edited by flyboy2160 on 22 Apr 2014, 01:25, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:off topic and inciteful comment about Helmut Marko
The Fuel is not only lighter but much more power effecient than the previous one. Ferrari had to carry less fuel than the previous GPs and u could read on the chart , that ferrari was one of the effecient cars.
This was mentioned bye Christian Danner on RTL during the race.
so now Ferrari need to make the engine use 99 kg of fuel, not 95 kg
and Shell need to make enough fuel for all (the Shell users) to have
and the FIA will have samples of the new fuel ?
Last edited by Tommy Cookers on 21 Apr 2014, 17:20, edited 1 time in total.
heidenreich27 wrote:Its true shell produced a much improved fuel.
The Fuel is not only lighter but much more power effecient than the previous one. Ferrari had to carry less fuel than the previous GPs and u could read on the chart , that ferrari was one of the effecient cars.
This was mentioned bye Christian Danner on RTL during the race.
This thread isn't a debate about Helmut Marko. I've deleted the start of that particular flame war. Just address actual facts about the Ferrari fuel, not personal reputations.
..and since it continued after I originally posted this warning, I've given a little Timeout.
jonaliew wrote:Interesting comment during the race, Vettel mentioning he doesn't have the straightline speed to catch Alonso. I thought the ferrari was down compared to RBR and Merc. So did we have a better race set up or a software fix for the PU?
RB is the slowest on the straights (again) because of their downforce and the weak and thirsty Renault PU, Ferrari has less drag, a littlebit less downforce, and a stronger and less thirsty PU.
very wrong, its red bull setup , torro rosso had higher topspeed than us.
That's because toro rosso has no down force. The Ferrari and Renault engines are roughly equal, and the Ferrari chassis is much better than its gotten credit for. Downforce is very close to Merc and Red Bull this year.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970
“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher
I have looked around at my usual sources and see nothing about the Shell fuel. Not to say that it is going to be published. I'd try to keep it hush hushif possible.