Mercedes AMG F1 W05

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
danwilkie90
danwilkie90
1
Joined: 03 Jan 2014, 18:34

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

During the Sky F1 coverage of the Brazilian Grand Prix, Martin Brundle said that it's understood that Mercedes have found at least 60hp more in their 2015 power units so far. O_O

Mission Control
Mission Control
1
Joined: 30 Jul 2012, 21:56
Location: South East UK

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

That's easy, they've just turned up the boost! 5bar up them next year, back to where they where 30ish years ago :shock:

Is the turbo a "part" open to being changed over the winter? I know a little about turbo's and compressor maps etc and you have to size the blower ( hot & cold ) to the volume/pressure to make it efficient and avoid all the many side effects you can suffer. I appreciate I'm simplying the fact it's a whole system ( IC, pipe size, exh size, plenum design etc ) but if the other manufacturers can't swap in bigger compressors, at a min, or whole units, such as trying to copy the split design, then I can see why they all have a semi.

If they can, that's a lot of waffle for nothing. :?

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Mission Control wrote:That's easy, they've just turned up the boost! 5bar up them next year, back to where they where 30ish years ago :shock:

Is the turbo a "part" open to being changed over the winter? I know a little about turbo's and compressor maps etc and you have to size the blower ( hot & cold ) to the volume/pressure to make it efficient and avoid all the many side effects you can suffer. I appreciate I'm simplying the fact it's a whole system ( IC, pipe size, exh size, plenum design etc ) but if the other manufacturers can't swap in bigger compressors, at a min, or whole units, such as trying to copy the split design, then I can see why they all have a semi.

If they can, that's a lot of waffle for nothing. :?
It is not the 80's, turning up the boost doesn't help. The limit is the fuel flow limit, not how much air you can stuff in
the engine

The only way to make more power is to use the fuel more efficiently and/or extract more energy from the exhaust which you can then use to drive the MGU-K

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Mission Control wrote:That's easy, they've just turned up the boost! 5bar up them next year, back to where they where 30ish years ago :shock:

Is the turbo a "part" open to being changed over the winter? I know a little about turbo's and compressor maps etc and you have to size the blower ( hot & cold ) to the volume/pressure to make it efficient and avoid all the many side effects you can suffer. I appreciate I'm simplying the fact it's a whole system ( IC, pipe size, exh size, plenum design etc ) but if the other manufacturers can't swap in bigger compressors, at a min, or whole units, such as trying to copy the split design, then I can see why they all have a semi.

If they can, that's a lot of waffle for nothing. :?

I've read its based on the increased injector pressure - they are taking to the max allowed matching Ferrari's injector pressure

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

langwadt wrote:
Mission Control wrote:That's easy, they've just turned up the boost! 5bar up them next year, back to where they where 30ish years ago :shock:

Is the turbo a "part" open to being changed over the winter? I know a little about turbo's and compressor maps etc and you have to size the blower ( hot & cold ) to the volume/pressure to make it efficient and avoid all the many side effects you can suffer. I appreciate I'm simplying the fact it's a whole system ( IC, pipe size, exh size, plenum design etc ) but if the other manufacturers can't swap in bigger compressors, at a min, or whole units, such as trying to copy the split design, then I can see why they all have a semi.

If they can, that's a lot of waffle for nothing. :?
It is not the 80's, turning up the boost doesn't help. The limit is the fuel flow limit, not how much air you can stuff in
the engine

The only way to make more power is to use the fuel more efficiently and/or extract more energy from the exhaust which you can then use to drive the MGU-K
The increased injector pressure is supposed to allow them to use fuel more efficiently - this could be related

http://forums.autosport.com/topic/19515 ... ?p=6932499

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
550
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Fuel injection pattern still does not explain the rumored fifty more horsepower... fuel injection management won't give you that much of a difference considering the 2014 engine would have been heavily tuned. Smells like some major hardware changes to me. ERS systems, combustion chamber, exhaust manifold, turbo. Slight changes to the cooling channels possibly... does anyone now if the rules allow the block internals to be altered?
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

tok-tokkie
tok-tokkie
36
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 16:21
Location: Cape Town

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Going back to Scarbs' Racers Edge on the gearbox. He states that the clutch is attached at the back of the engine. His diagram shows the 8 gear pairs with the selectors. There are 2 selector shafts. He says that the layout is the same as motorcycle gearboxes. The big thing about the twin selector shaft motorcycle gearboxes is that there are two clutches in those gearboxes. They alternate so 1 is engaged while the other is disengaged. You pre-select the next ratio you want (next gear up or down) and when you ask for the change the 2 clutches swop over giving the lightning quick change. These gearboxes are called Twin Clutch boxes.
So I wonder if Scarbs is quite correct in what he was showing.

User avatar
Ferraripilot
21
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 16:36
Location: Atlanta

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

To the poster who stated injection pressure does not result on more power.

A higher pressure direct injection system allows the same amount of fuel to be sprayed at a finer and more controlled mist resulting in more molecules being exposed to the flame front which results in quicker ignition of all molecules which yields more torque. Higher injection pressure is indeed directly related to torque and efficiency because of the above. If the Mercedes engine were operating at a 200-300bar system which is what was conjectured they ran, then going to 500bar or thereabouts would indeed increase efficiency.

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Ferraripilot wrote:To the poster who stated injection pressure does not result on more power.

A higher pressure direct injection system allows the same amount of fuel to be sprayed at a finer and more controlled mist resulting in more molecules being exposed to the flame front which results in quicker ignition of all molecules which yields more torque. Higher injection pressure is indeed directly related to torque and efficiency because of the above. If the Mercedes engine were operating at a 200-300bar system which is what was conjectured they ran, then going to 500bar or thereabouts would indeed increase efficiency.
Exactly - and they are going from a 200-300 bar to 500 bar max allowed per the rules.

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

tok-tokkie wrote:Going back to Scarbs' Racers Edge on the gearbox. He states that the clutch is attached at the back of the engine. His diagram shows the 8 gear pairs with the selectors. There are 2 selector shafts. He says that the layout is the same as motorcycle gearboxes. The big thing about the twin selector shaft motorcycle gearboxes is that there are two clutches in those gearboxes. They alternate so 1 is engaged while the other is disengaged. You pre-select the next ratio you want (next gear up or down) and when you ask for the change the 2 clutches swop over giving the lightning quick change. These gearboxes are called Twin Clutch boxes.
So I wonder if Scarbs is quite correct in what he was showing.
You're confused. Twin clutch gearboxes do work like you mentioned, but motorcycles don't use twin clutch boxes. They use traditional sequential boxes.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

PhillipM
PhillipM
385
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

mantikos wrote: Exactly - and they are going from a 200-300 bar to 500 bar max allowed per the rules.
Even the, I'd be very surprised if the difference was more than 4-5bhp

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

PhillipM wrote:
mantikos wrote: Exactly - and they are going from a 200-300 bar to 500 bar max allowed per the rules.
Even the, I'd be very surprised if the difference was more than 4-5bhp
Well you should be surprised then - I am not attributing a number to the increase, all I am saying is, they took a whole year to develop this and the efficiency increase is supposed to be significant.

Glyn
Glyn
3
Joined: 09 Sep 2012, 20:25

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

mantikos wrote:
PhillipM wrote:
mantikos wrote: Exactly - and they are going from a 200-300 bar to 500 bar max allowed per the rules.
Even the, I'd be very surprised if the difference was more than 4-5bhp
Well you should be surprised then - I am not attributing a number to the increase, all I am saying is, they took a whole year to develop this and the efficiency increase is supposed to be significant.
So with this increased 50 bhp. And better efficiency.

What are the advantages of Mercedes going for more power. Vs running less fuel to have a lighter car.

Or am I talking gobbledygook.

Facts Only
Facts Only
188
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 10:25

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Glyn wrote:
So with this increased 50 bhp. And better efficiency.

What are the advantages of Mercedes going for more power. Vs running less fuel to have a lighter car.

Or am I talking gobbledygook.
If you can create more power from the same amount of fuel, you can create the same amount of power from less fuel so it gives them the choice. Efficiency and Power are inseperable.
"A pretentious quote taken out of context to make me look deep" - Some old racing driver

tok-tokkie
tok-tokkie
36
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 16:21
Location: Cape Town

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Pierce89 wrote:
tok-tokkie wrote:Going back to Scarbs' Racers Edge on the gearbox. He states that the clutch is attached at the back of the engine. His diagram shows the 8 gear pairs with the selectors. There are 2 selector shafts. He says that the layout is the same as motorcycle gearboxes. The big thing about the twin selector shaft motorcycle gearboxes is that there are two clutches in those gearboxes. They alternate so 1 is engaged while the other is disengaged. You pre-select the next ratio you want (next gear up or down) and when you ask for the change the 2 clutches swop over giving the lightning quick change. These gearboxes are called Twin Clutch boxes.
So I wonder if Scarbs is quite correct in what he was showing.
You're confused. Twin clutch gearboxes do work like you mentioned, but motorcycles don't use twin clutch boxes. They use traditional sequential boxes.
Sure ordinary motorcycle boxes use a single clutch. But MotoGP bikes and some road bikes have dual clutch boxes. For the lightening quick changes in MotoGP and F1 they must be using dual clutch gearboxes.

Image


Blue clutch for blue gear set. Red clutch for red gear set. Honda VFR. Can set it to button activated change or automatic. Friend of mine knows the VFR well.