It was actually over 2 months, but besides the point regarding what my actual post was about. I’m providing a critical point of view about what constitutes board warnings, and how 3 is a forum ban, in my case, for a month.
If you would like to repost my warnings publicly, on the condition
that you mean to also repost the comments / posts they were responding to, then be my guest. I’ll happily recite two of them for you.
The first warning wasn’t even something I said at another member, it was actually a quote from one of your members personally attacking me in my feedback, that I had featured in my signature. So he didn’t get a warning because he broke the forum rules in the massive grey area that is the feedback section. So,yeah, I got a warning for what another guy said personally to me, about me. Great. I got a warning for being shot at by somebody personally, and making it public in my signature; hoping a mod would remove it from my feedback and address the individual. Instead it was only appropriate to remove my signature and penalise me and make the perpetrator a victim.
The other warning We can share in full of the incident, is here:
I got a warning for telling another member to get lost when he interfered in a genuine discussion about the race pace disparity between the front runners in Qatar. I tried to have a discussion for that topic with another member and he came in there with an agenda to kick things off.
So 2 warnings that really in my opinion, don’t deserve to amount to a ban at all. Hence, handing out ‘warnings’ a lil easily. The instigating parties should get a warning if any, and the other party could have their post removed.. that would be proportionate. P.s. I still think that individual should stick to what he’s appreciated for instead of baiting people and attacking them personally.
The stuff you said about moderators.. yeah I don’t think everyone is going to buy that my guy. Moderators are people.
People are biased and have individual feelings that drive their judgement and perceptions. This is why they have Jury to find verdicts in cases. We can’t even say mod staff get paid to be impartial can we? If a mod don’t like you, he will be motivated to get you on something, and less so on others. That’s a reality.
The forums members already pressure staff to be less biased to one team or driver as it is, and many find it inconsistent which posts get removed. People,know what’s up.
So anyway, only way you are gonna leave me alone is if I run to the mods instead of quipping back at those that can’t follow the rules when Engaging with me here?