[MVRC] Mantium Virtual Racecar Challenge 2024 (Grand Prix Cars)

Post here information about your own engineering projects, including but not limited to building your own car or designing a virtual car through CAD.
User avatar
Ft5fTL
26
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:27 am
Location: Izmir

Re: [MVRC] Mantium Virtual Racecar Challenge 2024 (Grand Prix Cars)

Post

This is my entry for Monza:
Image
Image
Image

Low downforce wings, new floor, new rear deflectors, and as usual; tweaked sidepods.
Mantium Challenge - Pure Power Racing

User avatar
variante
137
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 10:36 am
Location: Monza

Re: [MVRC] Mantium Virtual Racecar Challenge 2024 (Grand Prix Cars)

Post

As anticipated, only the wings have been changed for the upcoming Monza race.
You'll notice that this isn't a "minimum drag" configuration, but rather "mid-low". Hopefully, the relevance of braking and cornering performance will be enhanced by the official laptime simulator, compared to the one we're given.
Image
Image

Interesting sidepods from PurePower. It seems like the "RedBull intake" is becoming dominant. And a front wing with just 2 foils makes a lot of sense on low drag configurations.

Opposite approach from CAEdesign, but his drag and efficiency were already good at Silverstone, so I'm sure he'll be a strong contender.

G-raph is conservatively mirroring last year's configuration. Well, it worked last time!
150 simulations to develop the car is a healthy amount (isn't that much more than last year?).
I'm near enough, at 131. Maybe I'll run a few more for the last race, but I won't invest much more time in this Season.

User avatar
yinlad
27
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:10 pm

Re: [MVRC] Mantium Virtual Racecar Challenge 2024 (Grand Prix Cars)

Post

variante wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:59 pm
As anticipated, only the wings have been changed for the upcoming Monza race.
You'll notice that this isn't a "minimum drag" configuration, but rather "mid-low". Hopefully, the relevance of braking and cornering performance will be enhanced by the official laptime simulator, compared to the one we're given.
https://arcvstudio1.wordpress.com/wp-co ... ront-1.png
https://arcvstudio1.wordpress.com/wp-co ... rear-1.png

Interesting sidepods from PurePower. It seems like the "RedBull intake" is becoming dominant. And a front wing with just 2 foils makes a lot of sense on low drag configurations.

Opposite approach from CAEdesign, but his drag and efficiency were already good at Silverstone, so I'm sure he'll be a strong contender.

G-raph is conservatively mirroring last year's configuration. Well, it worked last time!
150 simulations to develop the car is a healthy amount (isn't that much more than last year?).
I'm near enough, at 131. Maybe I'll run a few more for the last race, but I won't invest much more time in this Season.
Not me quietly on 300 so far 😬

Not sure I share your optimism for a mid-low setup, Monza is just so insanely drag biased. More so without a DRS aspect of the lap simulation. I think this race could be very open reading into last year's results and depending on how it shakes out the championship might be VERY interesting going into R05
MVRC - Panthera

User avatar
LVDH
46
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:23 pm

Re: [MVRC] Mantium Virtual Racecar Challenge 2024 (Grand Prix Cars)

Post

The Rusted One wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2024 6:27 pm
Yes I submitted it, hopefully you guys received it on your side
Yes, can confirm and we even have another new team. Always great to see how more and more people get interested.

On my side, I had a super crazy week and have not even been able to submit the simulations. So, unfortunately you will all have to wait until next week for the results.

User avatar
G-raph
27
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2022 11:50 pm

Re: [MVRC] Mantium Virtual Racecar Challenge 2024 (Grand Prix Cars)

Post

Ft5fTL wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:58 am
This is my entry for Monza:
Low downforce wings, new floor, new rear deflectors, and as usual; tweaked sidepods.
Did you just turn up with a full F1 floor edge wing? I'm curious to see how much of it is left with the coarse mesh, and how you kept that legal in an X-plane, but that is some very impressive work.


variante wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2024 2:59 pm
G-raph is conservatively mirroring last year's configuration. Well, it worked last time!
150 simulations to develop the car is a healthy amount (isn't that much more than last year?).
Yes, it was 93 last year. However, I have changed my approach. Last year each simulation was a large geometry change, often in multiple areas of the car at once. This year the geometrical steps were much smaller, and always isolated to a single component. So it feels like I have spent much less time on CAD this year.


yinlad wrote:
Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:56 pm
Not sure I share your optimism for a mid-low setup, Monza is just so insanely drag biased. More so without a DRS aspect of the lap simulation. I think this race could be very open reading into last year's results and depending on how it shakes out the championship might be VERY interesting going into R05
I'm with you on that one, I feel Variante's "mid-low" level is risky. However, given he starts with a higher base efficiency he'll probably get away with it.