I think the venturi tunnels are the culprit.SB15 wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 23:34That's what they said in 2023/2024. However this year seems to be an entirely different story. They never had this type of problems with the rears overheating until they switch the concept. Remember the W14 in Monaco 2023, their tyre degradation was almost cut in half once they introduced the down washing sidepods. And that is a very important fact that many of us need to remember.Luscion wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 23:09Mercedes did stubbornly stick to their concept while telling hamilton to shut up and that he didnt know what he was talking about, with Toto later admitting they were wrong and sticking with the zero pod concept was their biggest mistake after testing in 2024, you can watch it all on netflix. Allison also said last year he doesnt think the zeropods concept will ever return.SB15 wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 23:01It's soo ironic that the Zero-pod was being looked at from a lot of teams and now for the next set of regulations.
Lewis's assumption about "Advantage locked in for years" maybe isn't as far fetched as previously believed, it may seem that the effects of Hamilton's feedback may of came back to bite Mercedes in the now future, they should've stubbornly stuck with the initial W14 design and focus on the other areas like the front wing, rear wing, and floor, and also pushing the driver position further rearwards. But the most important area they should've focused on is the suspension geometry which worked extremely well but they're limited with rear tyres overheating currently. They would've had a massive advantage in terms of tyres if the zero-pod concept was still around.
Now, Mercedes are having trouble with the current sidepod/aero concept that doesn't work well with the suspension geometry or how the car operates/drives and that's a tough pill to swallow. Mercedes can get back on track if they focus on the reworking the aero wake but as @Space-Heat said, it'll take 8-10 weeks or longer.
Merc has unfortunately failed in these sets of regulations.
We as fans thought the floor will solve the issues, then it was the sidepods would solve the issue, next it was the suspension will solve the issues, now it's brake cooling will solve the issues. But it seems to be a fatal flaw in how they design their aero particularly, the side-pods and Venturi tunnel exits.
Merc will be very glad to never these regulations ever again.
Seems like Mercedes brought a stiffer rear wing, so just add to their problems. Looks like Max looks prepped to win his 5th world title, because I know Mclaren will be hard like Mercedes at Spain.ringo wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 00:57Well most of us are reading quotes from the Simone Resta and George.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/geor ... 0724195/
I did not realize there were bumps in the development road, as yes they have been doing quite well so far with podiums and car looks good over a lap and first stint.
Jesus I didn't think it was that bad. That's outrageously bad, I never seen the rears open up that bad on any car.
Very important observations. Couldn't have put it better myself, well done.justmoi wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 09:13ONE THING though. And I think people have missed this. Merc, George all of them said after practice that their race pace was GOOD. That is shocking when you think about it considering how bad it was in the race. That right there shows seemingly a team that doesn't know what it's doing and is just confused. They knew and said repeatedly that they had to address their race pace. They bring updates (some) to fix this. Run it in practice (no rain no sprint) and declare that the race pace is good and they're looking forward to the race. And then have THAT race? Literally worst of the season. Like it was terrible. Tires near splitting.
What were they seeing? What are the looking at? It''s like a team chasing its own shadow. Like zero pods they've built a car with great theoretical pace but not usable pace. The baseline is strong but in this set of regulations that's just the beginning of the story. Other teams even those late to the party have figured it out. What's wrong with Merc? Are they really gonna be passed by Williams now? It's been one clown show after the other. For 4 years! Wow
And they've performed rather well in hot races this year. This over simplification is just immature and I doubt even they themselves believe otherwise they're even more confused than I thought. AND anyone noticed that even in the beginning of the season when they were doing well their some of their no shows compared to Mcl and RB has been in the COOLER rain! They're a complete non factor when it's wet. Watch first race of the season Australia again. Like this car has literally one window only. Whatever that is. Whatever that window is, whenever it's performed well, never looked like winning a race sadly.
Clown show
So, it looks like the car was heavily impacted by flexible parts because of multiple TD that addresses that as well as with the addition of a supposed Tyre wear TD.justmoi wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 09:13ONE THING though. And I think people have missed this. Merc, George all of them said after practice that their race pace was GOOD. That is shocking when you think about it considering how bad it was in the race. That right there shows seemingly a team that doesn't know what it's doing and is just confused. They knew and said repeatedly that they had to address their race pace. They bring updates (some) to fix this. Run it in practice (no rain no sprint) and declare that the race pace is good and they're looking forward to the race. And then have THAT race? Literally worst of the season. Like it was terrible. Tires near splitting.
What were they seeing? What are the looking at? It''s like a team chasing its own shadow. Like zero pods they've built a car with great theoretical pace but not usable pace. The baseline is strong but in this set of regulations that's just the beginning of the story. Other teams even those late to the party have figured it out. What's wrong with Merc? Are they really gonna be passed by Williams now? It's been one clown show after the other. For 4 years! Wow
And they've performed rather well in hot races this year. This over simplification is just immature and I doubt even they themselves believe otherwise they're even more confused than I thought. AND anyone noticed that even in the beginning of the season when they were doing well their some of their no shows compared to Mcl and RB has been in the COOLER rain! They're a complete non factor when it's wet. Watch first race of the season Australia again. Like this car has literally one window only. Whatever that is. Whatever that window is, whenever it's performed well, never looked like winning a race sadly.
Clown show
Merc used their C5s in quali which takes a lot of life out.. 5+ laps worth on such soft compounds I would guess. And they already have a tyre wear problem in some conditions (see Saudi). Using that C5 tyre in quali also distorted their actual pace; I would say in quali they were not the 3rd fastest car. Using the medium in quali allowed them to overachieve on Saturday and directly penalised them on Sunday which made it quite a stunning and noticeable drop-off, and hence a point of discussion. On the hard tyre Russell's degradation was okAR3-GP wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 00:07This is purely speculative, but if they changed the rear brake duct internals then it may not have worked as intended and instead just overheated the rear tires. Russells rear tires were melted after 5 or 6 laps. You could see the dark black bands on the surface of the tire in the rear facing camera.
George was complaining during the recce laps before the grid about a strange feeling at the back of the car. Mechanics checked it on the grid and could find no mechanical issue. I think what he was feeling even since the recce lap was that the rear tire thread was so hot that the thread was moving on the straights. Hard tire has higher operating temp. They use alternate sets of tires ( used M/S) on the recce laps. Sunday was the warmest day of the week and with the high fuel load. Mercedes insisted that there were updates to improve race pace and some which would not be visible.organic wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 12:02Merc used their C5s in quali which takes a lot of life out.. 5+ laps worth on such soft compounds I would guess. And they already have a tyre wear problem in some conditions (see Saudi). Using that C5 tyre in quali also distorted their actual pace; I would say in quali they were not the 3rd fastest car. Using the medium in quali allowed them to overachieve on Saturday and directly penalised them on Sunday which made it quite a stunning and noticeable drop-off, and hence a point of discussion. On the hard tyre Russell's degradation was okAR3-GP wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 00:07This is purely speculative, but if they changed the rear brake duct internals then it may not have worked as intended and instead just overheated the rear tires. Russells rear tires were melted after 5 or 6 laps. You could see the dark black bands on the surface of the tire in the rear facing camera.
For me it's probably a combination of factors. They introduced stiffer wings (both front and rear proven by Vanja) which cost them absolute laptime, they had a raft of upgrades which reset their understanding of their car somewhat, and their quali strategy amplified their tyre struggles