Could a pit lant start work?
Against general Internet common projection of cold race = better MB performance ..... there looks to me a correlation of raised tyre pressure suiting MB chassis to a benefit greater than others find detrimental.Vettel165 wrote: ↑31 May 2025, 22:40Q3 ANALYSIS
Many expected the 'flexy-wing' clampdown to hurt McL, but their quali performance was fantastic: excellent top speed, highest minimum speed in the slowest and fastest corners, sustainable deployment...
RBR: VER was full throttle for more time than any other driver. Only he didn't lift in T14! Downforce+bravery
Mercedes was well-rounded. The tow negated RUS's higher drag
Ferrari had no strengths, only areas in which it was less bad than others. 9km/h deficit to McL in T14, but also unimpressive top speed and high-speed cornering. The team has a lot of work to do.
https://postimg.cc/F71WRvmX
Could have sworn I saw several drivers go flat through the final corner, including Russell, Leclerc and Piastri.Vettel165 wrote: ↑31 May 2025, 22:40Q3 ANALYSIS
Many expected the 'flexy-wing' clampdown to hurt McL, but their quali performance was fantastic: excellent top speed, highest minimum speed in the slowest and fastest corners, sustainable deployment...
RBR: VER was full throttle for more time than any other driver. Only he didn't lift in T14! Downforce+bravery
Old spec car? If only some very minor things, he got new, latest spec front wing this time and a floor as well as I understand.
I would be fuming if I was him at any suggestion the car is designed only for him. It's not even the quickest, it's difficult to set up and drive and needs a perfectly executed race from everyone just to reach the podium on specific tracks.Seanspeed wrote: ↑31 May 2025, 22:38Yep, as usual in life, something is only ever one extreme or the other. Can never be anything in between.
Seems to me the car is genuinely a bit difficult to drive, but when it's given optimal treatment by an extraordinary talent, can still be decently fast.
It's ridiculous to say this is the sort of car that Max is ordering his engineers to make. Max has complained about it more than anybody. And he was vocally against replacing Lawson for the SPECIFIC reasoning that he doesn't want Red Bull management to think the car isn't a problem.
I think after qualifying it's too late. The other driver needs to qualify themselves.
Red bull technical group must be really really weak if the design the car specifically for Max but come up with understeery lazy behemoth at the start of each season since 2022 and it takes large part of a season to address it and balance it out somehow via upgrades and set-up compromises. Or probably someone should tell them Max doesn't like nor he needs understeer. Seems like they miss the trick.Waz wrote: ↑01 Jun 2025, 07:59I would be fuming if I was him at any suggestion the car is designed only for him. It's not even the quickest, it's difficult to set up and drive and needs a perfectly executed race from everyone just to reach the podium on specific tracks.
The finger should be firmly pointed at the technical team, not drivers. It's hard to fathom that nobody has been fired or reshuffled yet.
.Zhouvinazzi wrote: ↑31 May 2025, 20:51.
I don’t mean to be rude but this is just ridiculous bollocks. The car is designed by the engineers to be as fast as possible
and then it gets to Max, who has to drive it - not the other way around. He’s stated over and over that he doesn’t like the car, and the only reason he’s on the front row with it is because he’s one of the best drivers in the history of the sport. To think he wouldn’t mop with the 39 is laughable but time will make this all clear