By most accounts, getting the suspension/ride height and aerodynamics working together in harmony(and without a bunch of bouncing) is literally the big key to these regulations. It's not fair to ding Ferrari for trying to push further on this, as NOT doing it, and simply continuing with the good, but flawed foundation of the SF24 was never, ever gonna be enough to challenge this year.venkyhere wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025, 18:26I think we are going in circles, discussing and speculating what the 'big problem' with the SF25 is.
My take is very simple - they have an UTTER BASIC issue when they married the aero with the suspension , and are finding it super hard to solve it with band-aid fixes. They have found clever ways to hide this simple fact from the fans, using complicated technical jargon and anecdotal interviews. If the problem isn't 'baked in utter basic' they would have already found a fix after 14 races. There is no excuse for 'revamping' the SF24, going into the last year of the regs, without really having a clear mastery over the regulations, and then landing in this quagmire. Ferrari have dug themselves into a hole. It's as simple as that.
But there is so much 'money' to be made for youtubers and bloggers and vloggers and other social media personnel, that any 'verbal diarrhoea' on this topic is becoming 'technical content'. Let us folk in this forum not degrade ourselves into the same cesspool.
Yes, Ferrari failed in this endeavor, but blaming them for trying at all seems small-sighted.